Table 3. Comparison of the eyelid carcinoma classification performance of the DL-based fully automated differential diagnostic method with that of three pathologists.
Diagnostic approach | BCC and SC classification accuracy | P valuea | F1BCCb | F1SC |
---|---|---|---|---|
DL-based fully automated differential diagnostic method | 0.983 | – | 0.978 | 0.973 |
First junior pathologist | 0.644 | <0.05 | 0.656 | 0.632 |
Second junior pathologist | 0.729 | <0.05 | 0.637 | 0.784 |
Senior pathologist | 0.831 | <0.05 | 0.792 | 0.833 |
a, the P values are for the comparisons between the performance of each pathologist and the automated method and are based on the proportion test; b, F1BCC and F1SC: F1-scores for the identification of BCC and SC, respectively. DL, deep learning; BCC, basal cell carcinoma; SC, sebaceous carcinoma.