Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug;12(8):4166–4175. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-98

Table 3. Comparison of the eyelid carcinoma classification performance of the DL-based fully automated differential diagnostic method with that of three pathologists.

Diagnostic approach BCC and SC classification accuracy P valuea F1BCCb F1SC
DL-based fully automated differential diagnostic method 0.983 0.978 0.973
First junior pathologist 0.644 <0.05 0.656 0.632
Second junior pathologist 0.729 <0.05 0.637 0.784
Senior pathologist 0.831 <0.05 0.792 0.833

a, the P values are for the comparisons between the performance of each pathologist and the automated method and are based on the proportion test; b, F1BCC and F1SC: F1-scores for the identification of BCC and SC, respectively. DL, deep learning; BCC, basal cell carcinoma; SC, sebaceous carcinoma.