Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug;12(8):4190–4201. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-251

Table 3. Quantitative and texture features of conventional T2* maps of the PCL as a function of PCL condition (please see Table 2 for details on table organisation and display).

Conventional T2* feature PCL subregion PCL condition P value Post-hoc details
Intact PCL Partial PCL injury Complete PCL injury Intact vs. partial Intact vs. complete Partial vs. complete
Mean (ms) Entire 10.0±3.2 (9.7) 11.4±6.2 (9.5) 15.5±7.8 (14.0) 0.046 ns ns ns
Subregion
  Proximal 19.1±6.3 (17.7) 17.9±10.0 (14.2) 21.2±15.1 (13.7) 0.316 ns ns ns
  Central 11.3±4.0 (10.5) 8.0±2.6 (7.5) 9.1±2.0 (8.6) 0.222 ns ns ns
  Distal 9.6±3.2 (8.5) 6.8±2.3 (6.2) 7.9±2.7 (6.9) <0.001 ** ns ns
Energy Entire 0.34±0.08 (0.31) 0.38±0.10 (0.38) 0.37±0.12 (0.34) 0.710 ns ns ns
Homogeneity Entire 0.81±0.03 (0.81) 0.82±0.04 (0.82) 0.81±0.05 (0.80) 0.830 ns ns ns
Variance (ms2) Entire 57.9±34.4 (58.4) 89.7±74.2 (64.1) 109.1±67.7 (109.0) 0.046 ns ns ns

Data are mean ± standard deviation. Median values are indicated in parentheses. The level of significance of P≤0.01 was further stratified as P≤0.001 (**). PCL, posterior cruciate ligament; ns, non-significant.