Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 30.
Published in final edited form as: Mult Scler. 2020 Jun 22;27(4):568–578. doi: 10.1177/1352458520922830

TABLE 2.

Partial correlations are reported between memory (subjective, objective) and hippocampal volumes, controlling for age and sex on the left (partially-adjusted), and controlling for age, sex, mood, and IQ on the right (fully-adjusted). Levels of significance are color coded (see key). Correlations in bold withstood correction for multiple comparisons in total hippocampal volume analyses (Bonferroni p<.05/4=.0125) and subfield analyses (Bonferroni p<.05/48=0.0010). Asterisks indicate significant differences in correlations with subfield volume between objective and subjective memory using Steiger tests (http://quantpsy.org/corrtest/corrtest2.htm).

Partially-Adjusted Fully-Adjusted  
Objective Memory Subjective Memory Objective Memory Subjective Memory Key
Total Hippocampus 0.224 −0.257 0.147 −0.206 <.001
CA1 0.143* −0.334* 0.078* −0.253* <.010
Subiculum 0.146* −0.324* 0.048* −0.233* <.050
GC-DG 0.161 −0.214 0.121 −0.134
CA3 0.126 −0.155 0.134 −0.099
CA4 0.143 −0.189 0.116 −0.118
Presubiculum 0.111 −0.155 −0.037 −0.051
Parasubiculum 0.014 −0.080 −0.073 −0.025
Molecular Layer 0.181 −0.327 0.104 −0.237
Hippocampal Tail 0.083 −0.155 0.021 −0.111
Hippocampal Fissure 0.091 0.021 0.056 0.088
Fimbria 0.215 −0.205 0.098 −0.110
HATA 0.082 −0.171 0.062 −0.122