Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 30.
Published in final edited form as: Mult Scler. 2020 Jun 22;27(4):568–578. doi: 10.1177/1352458520922830

TABLE 3.

Partial correlations are reported between memory (subjective, objective) and non-hippocampal neuroimaging metrics, controlling for age and sex on the left (partially-adjusted), and controlling for age, sex, mood, and IQ on the right (fully-adjusted). Levels of significance are color coded (see key). Correlations in bold withstood correction for multiple comparisons in total hippocampal volume analyses (Bonferroni p<.05/4=.0125) and subfield analyses (Bonferroni p<.05/32=0.0016). Steiger tests did not reveal any differences in the strength of correlations between any neuroimaging metric and the two types of memory (subjective, objective).

Partially-Adjusted Fully-Adjusted  
Objective Memory Subjective Memory Objective Memory Subjective Memory Key
T2LV −0.318 0.201 −0.208 0.149 <.001
nGM 0.160 −0.240 0.064 −0.175 <.010
nDGM 0.297 −0.274 0.189 −0.192 <.050
nThalamus 0.254 −0.220 0.176 −0.133
nCaudate 0.241 −0.254 0.137 −0.195
nPutamen 0.195 −0.172 0.080 −0.100
nPallidum 0.272 −0.182 0.174 −0.122
nAmygdala 0.133 −0.159 0.071 −0.114