. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 30.

Published in final edited form as: Mult Scler. 2020 Jun 22;27(4):568–578. doi: 10.1177/1352458520922830

TABLE 4.

ANCOVA results for differences in total hippocampal volume across four groups: patient memory tertiles and healthy controls. ANCOVAs were performed separately for patient tertiles of subjective and objective memory, and for partially- and fully-adjusted models.

Partially-Adjusted Models
Subjective Memory F(3,212)=3.76, p=0.012, η_p²=0.051
	Mean	SE	95% CI
Healthy Control	10.29	0.163	9.970	10.611
MS: Fewest Complaints	10.361	0.124	10.117	10.605
MS: Medium Complaints	10.185	0.125	9.939	10.430
MS: Most Complaints	9.817	0.121	9.578	10.055
Objective Memory: F(3,212)=2.684, p=0.048, η_p²=0.037
	Mean	SE	95% CI

Healthy Control	10.289	0.164	9.965	10.612
MS: Higher Performance	10.361	0.124	10.117	10.605
MS: Medium Performance	10.091	0.124	9.847	10.335
MS: Lower Performance	9.896	0.124	9.652	10.140
Fully-Adjusted Models
Subjective Memory: F(3,210)=3.026, p=0.031, η_p²=0.041
	Mean	SE	95% CI

Healthy Control	10.271	0.164	9.948	10.595
MS: Fewest Complaints	10.357	0.127	10.106	10.608
MS: Medium Complaints	10.188	0.124	9.943	10.433
MS: Most Complaints	9.828	0.126	9.579	10.077
Objective Memory: F(3,210)=1.497, p=0.216, η_p²=0.021
	Mean	SE	95% CI

Healthy Control	10.262	0.166	9.936	10.589
MS: Higher Performance	10.318	0.128	10.066	10.570
MS: Medium Performance	10.103	0.124	9.858	10.348
MS: Lower Performance	9.943	0.129	9.689	10.197