Table 5.
Summary of AUROC for each study.
| References | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | Accuracy, % | AUROC | 95%CI | Standard error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coroller et al. (13) | – | – | – | 0.630 | 0.583–0.713 | 0.0331 |
| Parmar et al. (14) | 82.4 | 73.1 | 83.5 | 0.710 | 0.60–0.82 | 0.0561 |
| Sun et al. (15) | – | – | – | 0.770 | 0.69–0.86 | 0.0434 |
| Ling et al. (16) | – | – | – | 0.864 | 0.782–0.904 | 0.0311 |
| Coudray et al. (17) | 89.0 | 93.0 | 83.3 | 0.869 | 0.753–0.961 | 0.0531 |
| Xu et al. (18) | – | – | 63.5 | 0.670 | – | – |
| Baldwin et al. (19) | 99.57 | 28.03 | 40.01 | 0.896 | 0.876–0.915 | 0.0010 |
| Schroers et al. (20) | 86.95 | 93.25 | 88.89 | – | – | – |
| Wang et al. (21) | 64.04 | 58.97 | 61.47 | 0.640 | 0.61–0.67 | 0.0153 |
| Leleu et al. (22) | – | – | 72.6 | – | – | – |
| Ann et al. (23) | 79.9 | 75.2 | 65.8 | 0.761 | 0.59–0.71 | 0.0306 |
| Cong et al. (24) | 72.97 | 63.33 | 55.22 | 0.790 | 0.77–0.81 | 0.0102 |
| Botta et al. (25) | – | – | – | 0.840 | 0.63–0.98 | 0.0893 |
| Wei et al. (26) | 54.16 | 55.56 | 63.64 | 0.860 | 0.79–0.94 | 0.0383 |
| Khorrami et al. (27) | 61.34 | 57.16 | 63.81 | 0.880 | 0.79–0.97 | 0.0459 |
| Kirienko et al. (28) | 85.7 | 88.2 | 93.3 | – | – | – |
| Rossi et al. (29) | 100.0 | 66.7 | 85.7 | 0.850 | – | – |
| Chai et al. (30) | – | – | 95.3 | – | – | – |
| Wang et al. (31) | – | – | 72.4 | 0.712 | 0.678–0.770 | 0.0235 |