Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 18;10:956223. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.956223

TABLE 1.

Summary performance of catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation reaction.

Catalysts Main Product H2/CO2 Ratio T (oC) P (MPa) Loading (Wt%) XCO2 (%) Selectivity (%) STY (gkgcat −1 h−1) TOS (h) Ref
Cu-UiO-66 Methanol 3:1 175 1 1.0 1 100 Rungtaweevoranit et al. (2016)
Cu/UiO-66 Methanol 3:1 250 3.2 1.4 - 29.6 679.76 50 Zhu et al. (2020)
Cu@3D-ZrOx Methanol 3:1 260 4.5 12.4 13.1 78.8 796 105 Liu et al. (2019)
Cu/ZnOx@UiO-66 Methanol 3:1 250 4 5.9 4.3 87 28.3 100 Yang et al. (2021)
Cu/ZnOx@UiO-bpy Methanol 3:1 250 4 6.9 3.3 100 37.5 100 An et al. (2017)
Cu-ZrO2(ZrO2@HKUST-1) Methanol 3:1 220 3 11 6.8 64.4 287.9 16 Yu et al. (2021)
ZnO/Cu(Cu@ZIF-8) Methanol 3:1 260 4.5 57.6 933 76 Hu et al. (2019)
PdZn (Cu@ZIF-8) Methanol 3:1 270 4.5 14 55 650 50 Yin et al. (2018)
In2O3/Co3O4(In@ZIF-67) Methanol 3:1 300 5 87 650 100 Pustovarenko et al. (2020)
Ni@MIL-101 Methane 8:1 320 0.1 10 56.4 91.6 10 Mihet et al. (2019)
Ni@MOF-5 Methane 4:1 320 0.1 10 75.1 100 100 Zhen et al. (2015)
Ni@UiO-66 Methane 3:1 300 20 57.6 100 100 Zhao et al. (2018)
Ru/UiO-66 Methane 4:1 350 0.5 1.0 96 99 Lippi et al. (2017)
K-CuZnAl + Na-Fe@C Ethanol 3:1 350 5 39.2 35 50 Wang Y. et al., 2021
Fe/C-K (Basolite F300) Olefins 3:1 320 3 40 ∼40 50 Ramirez et al. (2018)