Table 4.
Relationship between Path Length and CoP SD2.
| Direction | Condition | Equation | R2 | Slope different from zero | Difference between conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ML | EC foam | y = 2.3 x + 1.96 | 0.39 | p < 0.01 | EC foam vs. EO foam: p = 0.70 EC foam vs. EC solid: p = 0.63 EC foam vs. EO solid: p = 0.94 |
| EO foam | y = 2.93 x + 0.87 | 0.51 | p < 0.001 | EO foam vs. EC foam: p = 0.70 EO foam vs. EC solid: p = 0.51 EO foam vs. EO solid: p = 0.64 |
|
| EC solid | y = 3.89 x + 0.79 | 0.39 | p < 0.01 | EC solid vs. EC foam: p = 0.63 EC solid vs. EO foam: p = 0.51 EC solid vs. EO solid: p = 0.39 |
|
| EO solid | y = 1.99 x - 0.85 | 0.05 | p = 0.33 | EO solid vs EC foam: p = 0.94 EO solid vs. EO foam: p = 0.64 EO solid vs. EC solid: p = 0.39 |
|
| AP | EC foam | y = 1.92 x + 1.6 | 0.57 | p < 0.001 | EC foam vs. EO foam: p = 0.82 EC foam vs. EC solid: p = 0.15 EC foam vs. EO solid: p = 0.13 |
| EO foam | y = 1.72 x + 0.94 | 0.51 | p < 0.001 | EO foam vs. EC foam: p = 0.82 EO foam vs. EC solid: p = 0.07 EO foam vs. EO solid: p = 0.08 |
|
| EC solid | y = 0.66 x + 0.91 | 0.14 | p = 0.106 | EC solid vs. EC foam: p = 0.15 EC solid vs. EO foam: p = 0.07 EC solid vs. EO solid: p = 0.85 |
|
| EO solid | y = 0.77 x + 0.81 | 0.20 | p < 0.05 | EO solid vs. EC foam: p = 0.13 EO solid vs. EO foam: p = 0.08 EO solid vs. EC solid: p = 0.85 |