Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 18;13:929132. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.929132

Table 4.

Relationship between Path Length and CoP SD2.

Direction Condition Equation R2 Slope different from zero Difference between conditions
ML EC foam y = 2.3 x + 1.96 0.39 p < 0.01 EC foam vs. EO foam: p = 0.70
EC foam vs. EC solid: p = 0.63
EC foam vs. EO solid: p = 0.94
EO foam y = 2.93 x + 0.87 0.51 p < 0.001 EO foam vs. EC foam: p = 0.70
EO foam vs. EC solid: p = 0.51
EO foam vs. EO solid: p = 0.64
EC solid y = 3.89 x + 0.79 0.39 p < 0.01 EC solid vs. EC foam: p = 0.63
EC solid vs. EO foam: p = 0.51
EC solid vs. EO solid: p = 0.39
EO solid y = 1.99 x - 0.85 0.05 p = 0.33 EO solid vs EC foam: p = 0.94
EO solid vs. EO foam: p = 0.64
EO solid vs. EC solid: p = 0.39
AP EC foam y = 1.92 x + 1.6 0.57 p < 0.001 EC foam vs. EO foam: p = 0.82
EC foam vs. EC solid: p = 0.15
EC foam vs. EO solid: p = 0.13
EO foam y = 1.72 x + 0.94 0.51 p < 0.001 EO foam vs. EC foam: p = 0.82
EO foam vs. EC solid: p = 0.07
EO foam vs. EO solid: p = 0.08
EC solid y = 0.66 x + 0.91 0.14 p = 0.106 EC solid vs. EC foam: p = 0.15
EC solid vs. EO foam: p = 0.07
EC solid vs. EO solid: p = 0.85
EO solid y = 0.77 x + 0.81 0.20 p < 0.05 EO solid vs. EC foam: p = 0.13
EO solid vs. EO foam: p = 0.08
EO solid vs. EC solid: p = 0.85