Table 6.

Mean difference between item-specific scores on Euro-MCD 2.0 from before and after participation in virtual ethics rounds (n = 89).

Statements adapted from the Euro-MCD instrument 2.0 (50)	Mean difference (T2-T1)	95% confidence interval	P-value
I recognize a situation as being ethically challenging	0.6	0.1–1.1	0.013
I am aware of others' perspectives in ethically challenging situations	0.3	−0.1–0.8	0.137
I can identify the different values at stake in ethically challenging situations	0.7	0.2–1.1	0.005
I can formulate arguments in favor of and against different courses of action in ethically challenging situations	0.6	0.1–1.1	0.013
I listen with an open mind to others when discussing an ethically challenging situation	0.6	0.2–1.1	0.010
I speak up in ethically challenging situations	0.5	−0.0–0.9	0.055
We openly express our viewpoints in ethically challenging situations	0.6	0.1–1.1	0.011
We all have opportunities to express our viewpoints when discussing ethically challenging situations	0.6	0.1–1.1	0.013
We respect different viewpoints when discussing ethically challenging situations	0.8	0.3–1.3	0.001
We feel secure to share emotions in ethically challenging situations	2.8	−1.6–7.3	0.203
We support each other when dealing with ethically challenging situations	2.4	−2.0–6.9	0.274
We made decisions on how to act in ethically challenging situations	2.8	−1.6–7.2	0.214
We base our decisions on moral considerations in ethically challenging situations	2.6	−1.8–7.0	0.245
We are responsive to the values and needs of patients and clients in ethically challenging situations	2.5	−1.9–6.9	0.257
We are able to explain and justify our care toward patients and clients	2.5	−1.9–7.0	0.255