Table 5.

Relationship between TG/HDL-c ratio and the risk of diabetes in participants with prediabetes in different sensitivity analyses.

Exposure	Model I (HR, 95% CI) P	Model I (HR, 95% CI) P	Model III (HR, 95%CI) P	Model IV (HR, 95% CI) P
TG/HDL-c ratio	1.109 (1.034, 1.190) 0.004	1.103 (1.020, 1.193) 0.014	1.115 (1.059, 1.175) <0.001	1.121 (1.045, 1.202) 0.001
TG/HDL-c ratio quartile
Q1	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
Q2	1.123 (0.900, 1.401) 0.305	1.306 (0.976, 1.749) 0.073	1.133 (0.948, 1.354) 0.169	1.128 (0.905, 1.407) 0.284
Q3	1.445 (1.166, 1.792) <0.001	1.602 (1.200, 2.138) 0.001	1.296 (1.091, 1.539) 0.003	1.461 (1.179, 1.810) <0.001
Q4	1.478 (1.191, 1.833) <0.001	1.691 (1.280, 2.233) <0.001	1.404 (1.184, 1.666) <0.001	1.505 (1.214, 1.866) <0.001
P for trend	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

Model I was a sensitivity analysis in participants without TC ≥5.0 mmol/L (N = 7738). We adjusted for age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, ALT, AST, sCr, smoking status, drinking status, and a family history of diabetes.

Model II was a sensitivity analysis in participants without LDL-c >2.5 mmol/L (N = 4218). We adjusted for age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, ALT, AST, sCr, smoking status, drinking status, and a family history of diabetes.

Model III was a sensitivity analysis of participants who had never consumed alcohol (N = 11998). We adjusted for age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, ALT, AST, sCr, smoking status, and a family history of diabetes.

Model IV was a sensitivity analysis of all participants with prediabetes (N = 15,107). We adjusted for age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, ALT, AST, sCr, and family history of diabetes.