Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 22;11:19. doi: 10.12703/r/11-19

Table 4. Randomized prospective clinical trials of percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure.

Parameter Closure-I
(No Benefit)
PC trial
(No Benefit)
Respect
(Inconclusive)
Reduce
(Inconclusive)
Close
(Benefit)
Defense-PFO
(Benefit)
Patients, number 909 414 980 664 663 120
Mean age, years 46 44.5 46 42.2 43.3 51.8
Moderate-large R->L, % 53 65.6 48.8 81.3 100 53
ASA, % 36.6 23.7 35.7 20.6 32.8 10
Antithrombotic Rx Aspirin, OAC APT, OAC APT, OAC APT APT, OAC APT
OAC, % 34 31 25 0 28 0
Follow-up, months 44 49 70.8 38.4 63.6 24
Stroke, % - M 3.1 2.4 5.8 5.4 6.0 10.5
Stroke, % - C 2.9 0.5 3.6 1.4 0.0 0
TIA, % - M 4.1 3.3 4.8 2.0
TIA, % - C 3.1 2.5 3.4 0
Death, % - M 0 0 2.2 0 0 0
Death, % - C 0 1.0 1.4 0.5 0 0

The stroke prevention outcomes are highlighted for comparison, indicating whether or not their results showed benefit of closure, or if they were inconclusive. See text for additional details. APT, antiplatelet therapy; ASA, atrial septal aneurysm; C, closure arm; M, medical arm; OAC, oral anticoagulation; R->L, right-to-left shunt; Rx, regimen; TIA, transient ischemic attack.