TABLE 4.
Summary of findings | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality assessment | Number of | |||||||
Outcomes | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication bias | intervention/control | WMD (95% CI) | Quality of evidence5 |
SBP | No serious limitations | Very serious limitations2 | Serious limitations3 | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | 431/394 | −6.40 (−8.74, −4.05) | ⊕⊕◯◯ Low |
DBP | No serious limitations | Very serious limitations4 | Serious limitations3 | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | 392/361 | −2.66 (−3.93, −1.39) | ⊕⊕◯◯ Low |
DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; WMD, weighted mean difference.
The test for heterogeneity is significant, and the I2 is moderate, 90.4%.
Studies conducted in participants with various conditions.
The test for heterogeneity is significant, and the I2 is moderate, 84.0%
⊕ symbol shows +1 quality evidence; for every serious limitation, one of this quality evidence is lost and changes to ◯ symbol; ⊕⊕◯◯: low (The true effect may differ significantly from the estimate).