Table 3.
Facilitators and Barriers to Immediate Postpartum Contraceptive Implantation Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
CFIR Domain | Barriers | Facilitators |
---|---|---|
Intervention | ||
Characteristics | ||
● Evidence Strength and Quality ● Relative Advantage ● Cost |
● Lacking funding for a training course | ● Strong evidence of safety and efficacy ● More advantages when compared to delayed insertion |
Outer setting | ||
● Patient Needs and Resources ● Cosmopolitanism ● External Policies and Incentives |
● Policy does not support non-teenagers ● Disconnect among organizations |
● Teenagers received contraceptive implants free of charge ● Other organizations were able to provide support ● Reimbursement policy and laws that promote autonomy |
Inner setting | ||
● Organizational Incentives & Rewards (Implementation Climate sub-construct) ● Available Resources (Readiness for Implementation sub-construct) ● Access to Knowledge & Information (Readiness for Implementation sub-construct) |
● Time constraints of providers and limits to device availability ● Lack of a training course |
● Setting key performance indicator (KPI) |
Characteristics of Individuals | ||
● Knowledge and Beliefs about the intervention ● Self-efficacy |
● Fear of pain during insertion and side effects of contraceptive implants ● Misbelief regarding timing of discontinuation ● Providers’ lack of insertion and counselling ability. |
● Receiving positive information from mother, friends, or providers |
Process | ||
● Champion (Engaging sub-construct) ● External Change Agents (Engaging sub-construct) ● Innovation Participants |
● Teachers’ negative attitudes towards sex education | ● The family planning unit nurse was referred to as a champion. ● Village health volunteers (VHVs) provide information ● ANC counselling ● Multimedia intervention such as video clips |
Abbreviation: ANC, antenatal care.