Table 2.
Source water type | System size (population served) | Post-Stage 1 THM4 mean concentrationsa () | Percentage reduction from Stage 1 to Stage 2b,c | Post-Stage 2 THM4 mean concentrationsd () | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | All systems | Total | ||||||
Surface water systems | 22.5 | 54.7 | 39.0 | 9.2% | 22.5 | 48.0 | 36.2 | |
10,000–100,000 | 23.6 | 52.4 | 34.2 | 9.2% | 23.6 | 43.7 | 31.1 | |
23.4 | 49.4 | 33.4 | 7.2% | 23.4 | 41.4 | 30.4 | ||
Subtotal | 23.4 | 51.0 | 34.2 | — | 23.4 | 42.9 | 31.1 | |
Groundwater systems | 6.3 | 56.4 | 10.9 | 1.4% | 6.3 | 48.7 | 10.7 | |
10,000–100,000 | 11.0 | 53.8 | 17.1 | 1.3% | 11.0 | 51.5 | 16.8 | |
16.4 | 50.5 | 19.6 | 1.7% | 16.4 | 47.6 | 19.4 | ||
Subtotal | 10.2 | 54.2 | 15.2 | — | 10.2 | 50.0 | 14.9 | |
All systems | Total | 18.5 | 51.4 | 28.7 | 7.8% | 18.5 | 43.7 | 26.4 |
Note: —, not applicable; D/DBPR, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule; THM4, trihalomethane-4.
Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule.
From Stage 2 economic analysis, Exhibit 5.23 with groundwater system reductions adjusted for nondisinfecting systems.
Using the fifth and 95th percentile estimates of percent reduction from Stage 1 to Stage 2, the overall range of percent reduction was estimated to be 4.4%–11.2%, resulting in an overall range for the post-Stage 2 THM4 concentration of . Calculation of the post-Stage 2 concentrations is based on two assumptions: a) All Stage 2 reductions will occur in the systems, and therefore the post-Stage 2 concentrations for the systems are the same as the Stage 1 concentrations; and b) For each source and size strata, the post-Stage 2 concentration for all systems is a population-weighted average of the concentrations in the two ranges of interest.
The to concentrations can be expressed as . Using the data for the surface water systems serving people as an example to calculate the THM4 post-Stage 2 concentration for the range results in: .