Table 2. Risk of bias assessment using Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS).
Author, Year | Score per Domain | Quality Rating | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selection | Comparability | Outcome | |||
1. | Puzniak L, 2021 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
2. | Wang L, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
3. | Michael S, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
4. | S. Hughes, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
5. | Contou D, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
6. | Cheng, L, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
7. | Neto A G M,2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
8. | Lardaro T, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
9. | Chen S, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
10. | Baskar V, 2021 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
11. | Russell C D, 2021 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Poor |
12. | Lehmann C J,2021 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
13. | Vaughn V,2021 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
14. | Miao Q, 2021 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
15. | Karami Z, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
16. | Garcia-Vidal C, 2021 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
17. | Crotty M P, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
18. | Wei W, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
19. | Karaba S, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
20. | Martin A, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
21. | Rothe K, 2021 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |
22. | Asmarawati T P, 2020 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Good |