Table 1. Comparison of EMINI participants who were followed up in the RHINO study with those who were lost to follow-up.
| Lost to follow-up | Followed up in RHINO | p-value* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # of subjects | |||||
| n | 856 | 1299 | |||
| Sex | 0.6315 | ||||
| female | n (%) | 440 (51.4) | 654 (50.3) | ||
| male | n (%) | 416 (48.6) | 645 (49.7) | ||
| missing | n | 0 | 0 | ||
| Age in 2009 in years | |||||
| median (IQR) | 17.0 (10.5 to 26.9) | 17.5 (10.1 to 30.9) | 0.2829 | ||
| missing | n | 0 | 0 | ||
| SES rank | |||||
| median (IQR) | 3.3 (1.3 to 6.7) | 3.1 (1.0 to 6.1) | 0.0010 | ||
| missing | n | 49 | 22 | ||
| HIV status | 0.0047 | ||||
| neg. | n (%) | 746 (87.3) | 1182 (91.1) | ||
| pos. | n (%) | 109 (12.7) | 116 (8.9) | ||
| missing | n | 1 | 1 | ||
| LF status | 0.7792 | ||||
| neg. | n (%) | 632 (73.8) | 952 (73.3) | ||
| pos. | n (%) | 224 (26.2) | 347 (26.7) | ||
| missing | n | 0 | 0 | ||
* p-value for differences between RHINO participants and those lost to follow-up.
** Social economic status (SES). Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables (Age and SES) and chi-squared test for binary variables (all others)