Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 10;128(3):389–406. doi: 10.1017/S0007114521003524

Table 2.

Summary of human trials examining the effect of rare sugars on postprandial blood glucose elevation*

Study and location Study population Trial design RS dose CHO load Ratio RS:CHO Control Difference in AUC P Conclusions
Braunstein et al., 2018(56), Canada Healthy volunteers (n 25). Age 37 (sd 16). BMI 24·7 (sd 3·4) Randomised, controlled, double-blind, multiple-crossover 5 g PSI in glucose solution 75 g glucose solution 1:15 No addition to CHO load –35 (sd 22) mmol/l × min (15·6 % reduction) 0·11 No significant effect on plasma glucose iAUC compared with 0 g PSI control
10 g PSI in glucose solution 2:15 –23 (sd 22) mmol/l × min (10·3 % reduction) 0·07
Hayashi et al., 2010(28), Japan Borderline diabetes (n 15) and healthy volunteers (n 11). Age 55·0 (sd 11·4). BMI 24·9 (sd 4·4) Randomised, controlled, double-blind, crossover 5 g PSI single dose in tea given with meal Standard meal (425 kcal, 84·5 g CHO, 13·3 g protein, 3·7 g fat) 1:17 Aspartame –743·3 mg × min/dl overall for meal (11·5 % reduction) < 0·01 AUC for PSI meal was significantly less than control aspartame meal overall and in subgroup of subjects with borderline diabetes but not in subgroup of healthy participants
Kimura et al, 2017(57), Japan Healthy volunteers (n 13). Age 35·7 (sd 2·0). BMI 20·9 (sd 0·7) Randomised, controlled, single-blind, crossover 5 g PSI single dose in solution, 30 min before meal Standard meal (571 kcal; 61 % of energy as CHO, 25 % as fat, 14 % as protein. (estimated 93 g CHO) 1:19 Aspartame NA NA PSI supplementation gave significantly lower change in plasma glucose at 90 min only, compared with aspartame control. No significant difference in plasma insulin
Noronha et al., 2018(29), Canada Subjects with T2D, controlled with diet or OHA, not insulin (n 24). Age 66 (sd 1·2). BMI 27·0 (sd 0·9) Randomized controlled, double-blind, crossover 5 g PSI in glucose solution 75 g glucose solution 1:15 No addition to CHO load –48·1 mol × min/l (6·2 % reduction) 0·051 Significant linear dose–response gradient for reduction in AUC for glucose
10 g PSI in glucose solution 2:15 –60·1 mol × min/l (7·7 % reduction) 0·015
Matsuo & Lu, 2011(30), Japan† Healthy volunteers (n 44) No crossover, no info on randomisation or blinding 6 g PSI single dose before meal Normal lunch selected by subjects (636 kcal, 87·6 g CHO for males, 513 kcal, 18·9 g CHO for females) 1:15 male, 1:3 female 6 g d-fructose NA NA Postprandial glycaemic response significantly lower after PSI compared with D-fructose control
Iida et al., 2008(32), Japan† Healthy volunteers (n 20) Randomised, single-blind crossover 2·5, 5 or 7·5 g PSI 75 g maltodextrin solution 1:10, 1:15 or 1:30 No addition to CHO load NA NA Dose-dependent reduction in postprandial blood glucose, with significant effects at doses of 5 g or greater
Tanaka et al., 2020(35)
Japan†
Healthy volunteers (n ?) Randomised, single blind crossover 0, 1·8, 3·6 or 12·5 g PSI in 50 g chocolate 50 g chocolate (carbohydrate content not provided) NA NA NA NA Reduction in postprandial blood glucose and insulin with PSI compared with control
Nakamura et al., 2017(34), Japan† Healthy volunteer (n 10) Randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover 0, 15, 25 or 35 g RSS Total 50 g CHO-sucrose with part replaced by RSS 3:7, 5:5 or 7:3 Sucrose NA NA Compared with 100 % sucrose control, 5:5 and 7:3 ratios gave significant reduction in iAUC for glucose and insulin. 3:7 ratio gave significant reduction in iAUC for insulin but not glucose
Healthy volunteers (n 12) 5 g RSS Total 10 g CHO-sucrose with half replaced by RSS 1:1 Sucrose Significant reduction in iAUC for glucose and insulin with 1:1 RSS:sucrose compared with sucrose alone
Yamada et al., 2018(31), Japan† Healthy volunteers (n 14) Randomised, single blind, placebo-controlled crossover Half sucrose replaced with RSS Sucrose (no info on amount) 1:1 Sucrose NA NA Significant reduction in iAUC for glucose compared with sucrose control
Healthy volunteers (n 10) Sucrose replaced with RSS 3:10 and 5:5 Sucrose Significant reduction in iAUC for glucose compared with sucrose control
Kwak et al., 2013(33), Korea Healthy volunteers (n 52). Age 35·8 (sd 1·45). BMI 23·7 (sd 0·54) Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover 5 or 10 g TAG in drink before a meal Standard meal, 356 kcal of which 60 % (53 g) CHO 1:10 or 1:5 Sucralose-erythritol drink –3·3 mg/dl per h (1·32 % reduction) NS Significant reduction in iAUC only in hyperglycaemic subjects
Hyperglycaemic subjects (impaired fasting glucose or newly diagnosed T2D, n 33). Age 57·2 (sd 1·71). BMI 25·0 (sd 0·46) –15·4 mg/dl per h (4·0 % reduction) < 0·05
Wu et al., 2012(52), Australia Healthy volunteers (n 10). Age 28·2 (sd 4·0). BMI 25·5 (sd 1·5) Randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover 40 g TAG–isomalt mixture (16 g TAG), 20 min before meal Standard meal containing 63 g CHO 1:4 Sucralose preload +0·5 mmol/l × min (0·25 % increase) NS Significant increase in iAUC with glucose preload, but no significant differences between TAG and control

RS, rare sugar; PSI, d-psicose; CHO, carbohydrate; T2D, type 2 diabetes; OHA, oral hypoglycaemic agents; NA, not available; RSS, rare sugar syrup; TAG, d-tagatose; NS, not significant.

*

Difference in iAUC (incremental area under the curve) for glucose is the difference between rare sugar treatment group v. control group in 120 min following ingestion of carbohydrate load. P-values are for significance of difference as stated in the referenced article. Ages are given in years, and BMI is given in kg/m2. †Articles not available in English