Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 5;36(8):2108–2120. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01615-z

Table 1.

Summary of best available therapies received by real-world patients, overall and by line of therapy.

Overalla First line Second line Third or later lines
Number of unique patients N = 141 N = 118 N = 69 N = 35
Total number of lines of therapy included N = 222 N = 118 N = 69 N = 35
Total number of lines of therapy contributed by patient
   Mean (SD) 1.6 (0.9)
   Median (min, max) 1.0 (1.0, 7.0)
   Number of lines of therapy contributed, n (%)
     1 86 (61.0%)
     2 40 (28.4%)
     ≥3 15 (10.6%)
Year of line of therapy start date, n (%)
   2009–2013 66 (29.7%)
   2014–2017 99 (44.6%)
   2018–2021 57 (25.7%)
Agents used in each included line of therapy, n (%)
   TKI therapy 120 (54.1%) 71 (60.2%) 34 (49.3%) 15 (42.9%)
   Cytoreductive therapy 91 (41.0%) 39 (33.1%) 33 (47.8%) 19 (54.3%)
   Biologic therapy 25 (11.3%) 14 (11.9%) 8 (11.6%) 3 (8.6%)
  Agent-level information availableb N = 196 N = 107 N = 59 N = 30
    TKI
      Midostaurin 99 (50.5%) 58 (54.2%) 29 (49.2%) 12 (40.0%)
      Ripretinib 4 (2.0%) 2 (1.9%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (6.7%)
      Ibrutinib 3 (1.5%) 3 (2.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
      Dasatinib 2 (1.0%) 1 (0.9%) 1 (1.7%) 0 (0.0%)
      Imatinib 2 (1.0%) 1 (0.9%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (3.3%)
   Cytoreductive therapy
      Cladribine 49 (25.0%) 20 (18.7%) 18 (30.5%) 11 (36.7%)
      Hydroxyurea 17 (8.7%) 10 (9.3%) 5 (8.5%) 2 (6.7%)
      Azacitidine 3 (1.5%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (3.4%) 1 (3.3%)
   Biologic
      Interferon-alfa 11 (5.6%) 9 (8.4%) 2 (3.4%) 0 (0.0%)
      Pegylated interferon 8 (4.1%) 3 (2.8%) 4 (6.8%) 1 (3.3%)
      Brentuximab vedotin 4 (2.0%) 2 (1.9%) 2 (3.4%) 0 (0.0%)
      Gemtuzumab ozogamicin 1 (0.5%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (3.3%)

BAT best available therapy, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, max maximum, min minimum, SD standard deviation, TKI tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

aThe BAT cohort was restricted to patients with available ECOG score during any time before to 3 months after the index date.

bAgent-level information for prior treatments was reported among patients from all study sites except Medical University of Vienna (Austria) (N = 26 lines of therapy), where only treatment class information was collected per local regulations.