Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 1;13:4453. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32238-8

Table 1.

Reaction optimizationa

graphic file with name 41467_2022_32238_Taba_HTML.gif
Entry R*SH Solvent Yield /%b D /%c erd
1 S1 toluene:D2O (3:1) 56 96 48:52
2 S2 toluene:D2O (3:1) 79 90 51:49
3 S3 toluene:D2O (3:1) 42 90 53:47
4 S4 toluene:D2O (3:1) 50 95 58:42
5 S5 toluene:D2O (3:1) 67 94 93:7
6 S6 toluene:D2O (3:1) 49 96 93:7
7 S7 toluene:D2O (3:1) 68 94 92:8
8 S5 toluene:D2O (1:1) 43 97 93:7
9 S5 toluene:D2O (4:1) 71 90 93:7
10 S5 toluene 73 88:12
11e S5 toluene:D2O (3:1) 73 94 93:7
12f S5 toluene:D2O (3:1) N.D.
13g S5 toluene:D2O (3:1) N.D.
14h toluene:D2O (3:1) N.D.
graphic file with name 41467_2022_32238_Tabb_HTML.gif

er enantiomeric ratio, N.D. Not detected.

aUnless otherwise noted, all reactions were carried with 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.1 mmol), 4DPAIPN (1 mol%), R*SH (15 mol%), toluene (0.75 mL), D2O (0.25 mL) under 10 °C for 48 h with irradiation from a 30 W blue LED.

bIsolated yield of 3a.

cDetermined by 1H NMR analysis of the isolated product.

dDetermined by chiral HPLC analysis.

eReaction time: 72 h.

fNo photocatalyst.

gWithout light irradiation.

hNo thiol catalyst.