Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 19;13:925696. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.925696

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of BBB score.

Pooled estimates (7 d) No. of studies WMD (95% CI) P -value
Model
Impactor 18 3.60 [2.73, 4.46] P <0.00001
Aneurysm clip 7 2.16 [0.83, 3.49] P = 0.002
Species
SD rats 18 3.49 [2.20, 4.78] P <0.00001
Wistar rats 5 1.77 [0.27, 3.28] P = 0.02
Dosage
1,000 UI/kg 9 3.13 [1.05, 5.21] P = 0.003
5,000 UI/kg 11 4.05 [2.23, 5.88] P <0.0001
Administration time
Before modeling 2 0.91 [−1.01, 2.83] P=0.35
After modeling 22 3.51 [2.59, 4.44] P <0.00001
After modeling
Once 13 3.30 [2.25, 4.35] P <0.00001
Multi 9 3.88 [2.07, 5.68] P <0.0001
Mode of administration
Once 15 2.96 [1.50, 4.42] P <0.00001
Multi 9 3.88 [2.07, 5.68] P <0.00001
Once
Before modeling 2 0.91 [−1.01, 2.83] P = 0.35
After modeling 14 3.65 [2.62, 4.68] P <0.00001
Multi
>3 times 4 4.27 [1.61, 6.92] P = 0.002
≤ 3 times, >1 time 5 3.28 [1.24, 5.32] P = 0.002

BBB, Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan locomotor rating; WMD, weighted mean difference; SD, Sprague-Dawley.