Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 7;9:uhac124. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac124

Table 2.

Summary of significant marker-trait associations identified by GWAS analysis using two approaches (FarmCPU and MLMM) for all the photosynthetic traits across six categories (A–F) in well-water (WW), water-stress (WS), water-recovery (WR) conditions and for drought stress index (DSI) and drought recovery index (DRI) of traits as a relative measure

Trait Classification Marker-Trait WW WS WR DSI DRI
(A) Chl fluorescence (Mother trees- Array) Associations 63 69 10 41 23
Unique SNPs 50 41 9 35 18
(B) Chl fluorescence (Mother trees- GBS) Associations 59 64 32 31 9
Unique SNPs 43 45 26 23 5
(C) Chl fluorescence (Progeny-GBS) Associations 51 14 26 14 68
Unique SNPs 38 10 23 13 55
(D) Gas exchange (Mother trees- Array) Associations 28 15 2 11 1
Unique SNPs 25 14 2 10 1
(E) Gas exchange (Mother trees- GBS) Associations 56 38 13 14 24
Unique SNPs 32 29 10 14 21
(F) Gas exchange (Progeny-GBS) Associations 2 4 5 - 8
Unique SNPs 2 4 4 - 8
Total associations Associations 259 204 88 111 133
Unique SNPs 190 143 74 95 108
Associations detected by the FarmCPU approach Associations 71 47 14 24 32
Unique SNPs 53 40 14 24 27
Associations detected by the MLMM approach Associations 188 157 74 87 101
Unique SNPs 146 115 65 75 88
SNPs detected by both approaches Total SNPs 259 204 88 111 133
Unique SNPs 199 155 79 99 115