Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 26;2015(3):CD010743. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010743.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Scheinin 1975 Xylitol (plus sorbitol and 'other polyols') gum versus sucrose (plus sorbitol and 'other polyols') gum. No appropriate control group as sucrose is cariogenic (causes caries)
Kandelman 1990 Cluster randomised controlled trial but with serious problems with the randomisation procedure (some of the clusters were self selecting i.e. some schools did not allow chewing of gum in the classroom and therefore they were the controls and were not randomly assigned)
Alanen 2000 Sealants versus 2‐year use of xylitol gum versus 3‐year use of xylitol gum. No appropriate comparison of interest
Alanen 2000b Cluster randomised controlled trial but with serious problems with the randomisation procedure (some of the clusters were selectively rather than randomly assigned)
Machiulskiene 2001 Cluster randomised controlled trial but with one cluster per arm, and therefore of inappropriate design
Kovari 2003 Children using xylitol gum but not brushing teeth during daycare hours versus children brushing their teeth with fluoride toothpaste during daycare hours (after lunch) but not using xylitol gum. No appropriate control group
Chi 2014 Cluster randomised controlled trial but with two clusters per arm, and therefore of inappropriate design
Lee 2014 The study authors kindly provided us with a prepublication copy of the study and we were able to see that the intervention was only given for 9 months. Our inclusion criterion states that the intervention must be given for at least 1 year