Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Jun 29;61(7):929–953. doi: 10.1007/s40262-022-01137-y

Table 2.

Recommendations for maximum population-based cefepime dosing regimens in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy

Study, year Effluent rates (L/h)a CVVH CVVHD or CVVHDF
Trotman et al. (2005) [176] Not available 1–2 g q12h 2 g q12h
Heintz et al. (2009) [177] Not available 1–2 g q12h 1 g q8h or 2 g q12h
Scheetz et al. (2006) [68] ≤1 2g q24h 2 g q24h
2 2g q12h 2 g q12h
3 2g q8h 2 g q8h
Carlier et al. (2015) [67] ≤1 1 g q8h 1 g q8h
2 2 g q8h 2 g q8h or 1 g q6h
3 2 g q8h 2 g q8h or 1 g q6h
Chaijamorn et al. 2018)b [178] ≤1 1.75 g LD then 1.5 g q8h 1.75 g LD then 1.5 g q8h
2 2 g LD then 1.5 g q8h 1.75 g q8h
3 2 g LD then 1.5-1.75 g q8h 2 g q8h
Philpott et al. (2019) [179] ≤1 Not available Not available
2 2 g q8h as a 4-h infusion 2 g q8h as a 4-h infusion
3 2 g q8h as a 4-h infusion 2 g q8h as a 4-h infusion

CVVH continuous venovenous hemofiltration, CVVHD continuous venovenous hemodialysis, CVVHDF , h hour, LD loading dose, q6h every 6 h, q8h every 8 h, q12h every 12 h, q24h every 24 h

a

Effluent rates in mL/kg/h were converted to L/h

b

Dosing for minimum inhibitory concentrations up to 8 μg/mL