Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 13;29(4):1799–1809. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02501-w

Table 2.

Characteristics of the included studies and 123I-mIBG SPECT results evaluation method.

Authors Score Evaluation scale Polar map (segments) Population
Boogers et. al. 34 ESS 21.6 ± 10.1 0-4 17 116 CHF
LSS 26.8±10.0
De Vincentis et al.13 ESS 31.4±11.9 0-4 17 170 CHF
LSS 36.2±12.3
DSS − 4.74±8.6
Verschure et al.31 LSS 39.4 ± 15.5 0-4 17 111 CHF
Iqbal et al.12 ESS / LSS / MUP 0-4 20 22 CHF
Jacobson et al.8 SS 0-4 17 985 CHF
Jacobson et al.26 / 0-4 17 961 CHF
Marshall et al.35 SDS 29.5±9.9 / / 27 CHF
MS 11.9±8.0
Somsen et al.44 / / / 16 CHF
Travin et al.28 ESS 41.2±12.4 0-4 17 471 CHF
PS 19.2±11.3
MS 22.5±12.8
Van der Veen et al.30 / / /

54 patients

28 CHF

Kasama et al.38 LSS 0-4 17 208 CHF
Clements et al.36 SDyS 0-4 17 938 HF
Doi et al.40 / / 17 468 HF
Yamamoto et al.39 SSS 0-4 17 73 CHF
Hage et al.49 / / / 917 HF
Sazonova et al.41 ESS 21-18 0-4 20 80 CHF
LSS 24-20

/ not reported; CHF congestive heart failure; HF heart failure; ESS early summed score; LSS late summed score; DSS defect summed score; MUP myocardial uptake indices; MS (perfusion/innervation) mismatch score; PS perfusion score; WR wash-out rate; UR uptake ratio; SDyS segment dysinnervation score; SSS stress summed score