Table 3.
Univariate linear regression for resting energy expenditure quotient.
Standardized beta | 95% CI | P-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||
Partial or gross total resection | −0.12 | −0.21 | −0.02 | 0.022* |
Progression or recurrence of the tumor | −0.10 | −0.19 | −0.01 | 0.030* |
Severe clinical hypothalamic dysfunctiona | −0.23 | −0.33 | −0.12 | <0.001* |
Posterior hypothalamic damageb at time of diagnosis | −0.10 | −0.19 | −0.01 | 0.027* |
Posterior hypothalamic damage on MRI at time of REE measurement | −0.13 | −0.21 | −0.04 | 0.004* |
Severe mammillary body damagec | −0.12 | −0.21 | −0.04 | 0.007* |
Pan hypopituitarism with diabetes insipidus | −0.9 | −0.17 | −0.00 | 0.050* |
Resting energy expenditure quotient: Measured resting energy expenditure divided by predicted resting energy expenditure (calculated by Schofield equation). Diabetes insipidus at follow-up, central precocious puberty at follow-up, age at diagnosis, age at follow-up, BMI SDS at follow-up, fat-mass percentage (n = 54), hydrocephalus at diagnosis, tumor size (n = 63), severe mammillary body damage at diagnosis (n = 65), radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were not significantly associated with mREE/pREE quotient.
aSevere clinical hypothalamic dysfunction: Presence of obesity (>+3.0 BMI SDS) or extreme weight gain (>+2.0 BMI SDS) with (severe) hyperphagia and presence of other clinical manifestations, such as impaired thirst, rage behavior, or disturbances of thermoregulation, memory, and sleep-wake pattern. bPosterior hypothalamic damage graded with Muller: hypothalamic involvement/lesion of the anterior and/or solely posterior hypothalamic area, i.e. involving the area beyond mammillary bodies. cSevere mammillary body damage: severe involvement or damage (unrecognizable structures or both sided damaged) of the mammillary bodies. *Statistically significant.