. 2022 Jul 26;45(8):1772–1778. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2563

Table 3.

Spatial autoregressive model regression results across cause-specific YLL rates for the years 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2014

	Diabetes				All cause
	1990	2000	2010	2014	1990	2000	2010	2014
Continuous HOLC exposure
HOLC grade (score 1–4)	0.44 (0.36– 0.53)^***	0.50 (0.43– 0.57)^***	0.49 (0.41– 0.56)^***	0.51 (0.43– 0.59)^***	0.30 (0.24– 0.37)^***	0.30 (0.25– 0.36)^***	0.29 (0.24– 0.34)^***	0.30 (0.24– 0.35)^***
No. of observations	109	109	109	109	109	109	109	109
Pseudo R²	0.53	0.59	0.53	0.51	0.54	0.58	0.52	0.51
Binary HOLC exposure of A/B vs. C/D
HOLC grade (A/B vs. C/D)	0.75 (0.63– 0.87)^***	0.81 (0.69– 0.92)^***	0.78 (0.65– 0.90)^***	0.81 (0.67– 0.94)^***	0.48 (0.39– 0.58)^***	0.47 (0.39– 0.56)^***	0.45 (0.37– 0.53)^***	0.46 (0.37– 0.54)^***
No. of observations	109	109	109	109	109	109	109	109
Pseudo R²	0.53	0.55	0.50	0.48	0.49	0.52	0.47	0.45

The outcome measure is age standardized (across all ages) and in logarithms. Robust 95% CIs are reported within the parentheses. Significance is denoted as follows:

^***

P < 0.01.