Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Ali 2021 | Single‐arm study with less than 100 participants (53) |
American Society of Safety Professionals 2021 | Not an intervention study |
Batteux 2021 | Investigates scenarios that cannot be manipulated |
Bell 2021 | Not an intervention study |
ChiCTR2100043018 | Not an intervention study |
Community Practitioner 2021 | Not an intervention study |
Crawshaw 2021 | Does not summarise interventions to increase uptake |
Crawshaw 2021b | Does not summarise interventions to increase uptake |
Davis 2021 | Hypothetical scenario that cannot be manipulated (vaccine efficacy) |
Gakuba 2021 | Uncontrolled study with less than 100 participants (n = 61) |
Gehrau 2021 | Not an intervention study |
Guelmami 2021 | Not an intervention study |
Hofer 2021 | Wrong publication type (opinion piece) |
Kaplan 2021 | Investigates scenarios that cannot be manipulated |
Kirkpatrick 2021 | Wrong vaccine (MMR) |
Knight 2021 | Development but not testing of an intervention |
Kumar 2021 | Not an intervention study |
Lim 2020 | Not an intervention study |
Loomba 2021 | Wrong publication type (correction) |
Loomba 2021a | Measures the effect of misinformation on vaccine intent and thus not relevant to the research objective |
NCT04694651 | Not an intervention study |
Rahmandad 2021 | Not an intervention study |
Salali 2021 | Not an intervention study |
Shmueli 2021 | No intervention |
Sprengholz 2021b | Wrong publication type |
Thaker 2021 | Measures effect of vaccine misinformation |
Vasquez 2021 | Not an intervention study |
Wagner 2021 | Not an intervention study |
Yousuf 2021 | Intervention targets influenza vaccine, not COVID‐19 vaccine |
Yuen 2021 | Not an intervention study |
MMR: measles, mumps and rubella.