Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 3;2022(8):CD013829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013829.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Bradley 2021 Irrelevant intervention ‐ lung health check versus usual care
Brodersen 2014 Irrelevant trial design 
Dawson 2020 Irrelevant trial design
de‐Torres 2021 Duplicate
Favre 2003 Irrelevant trial design
Fink 2012 Irrelevant trial design
Garg 2002 Irrelevant outcomes ‐ feasibility of conducting a RCT for lung cancer screening among subjects with varying degrees of lung cancer risk
Goulart 2013 Irrelevant trial design
Guldbrandt 2015 Irrelevant patient population
Hassannezhad 2018 Irrelevant trial design
Henschke 2000 Irrelevant trial design
Henschke 2002 Irrelevant trial design
Henschke 2015 Irrelevant trial design
Horeweg 2013 Irrelevant trial design
ISRCTN42704678 Irrelevant intervention ‐ lung health check versus usual care
Kramer 2011 Irrelevant trial design 
Kulaga 2007 Irrelevant trial design 
Marcus 2006 Irrelevant intervention ‐ sputum cytology and CXR versus usual care
NCT02431962 Irrelevant trial design
Park 2022 Irrelevant outcome ‐ to evaluate the effects of computer‐aided diagnosis (CAD) on inter‐reader agreement in Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung‐RADS) categorisation
Robbins 2019 Irrelevant trial design
Schabath 2019 Irrelevant trial design
Schreuder 2021 Irrelevant trial design
Spiro 2019 Irrelevant intervention ‐ sputum cytology and cytometry versus usual care
Strauss 2012 Irrelevant trial design
Strauss 2015 Irrelevant trial design
Sullivan 2019 Irrelevant intervention‐ serum biomarker versus usual care
Sullivan 2021 Irrelevant intervention ‐ serum biomarker versus usual care
Yang 2008 Irrelevant intervention ‐ LDCT and serum biomarker versus usual care
Yip 2013 Irrelevant trial design

CXR: chest x‐ray; LDCT: low‐dose computed tomography; RCT: randomised controlled trial