Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Bradley 2021 | Irrelevant intervention ‐ lung health check versus usual care |
Brodersen 2014 | Irrelevant trial design |
Dawson 2020 | Irrelevant trial design |
de‐Torres 2021 | Duplicate |
Favre 2003 | Irrelevant trial design |
Fink 2012 | Irrelevant trial design |
Garg 2002 | Irrelevant outcomes ‐ feasibility of conducting a RCT for lung cancer screening among subjects with varying degrees of lung cancer risk |
Goulart 2013 | Irrelevant trial design |
Guldbrandt 2015 | Irrelevant patient population |
Hassannezhad 2018 | Irrelevant trial design |
Henschke 2000 | Irrelevant trial design |
Henschke 2002 | Irrelevant trial design |
Henschke 2015 | Irrelevant trial design |
Horeweg 2013 | Irrelevant trial design |
ISRCTN42704678 | Irrelevant intervention ‐ lung health check versus usual care |
Kramer 2011 | Irrelevant trial design |
Kulaga 2007 | Irrelevant trial design |
Marcus 2006 | Irrelevant intervention ‐ sputum cytology and CXR versus usual care |
NCT02431962 | Irrelevant trial design |
Park 2022 | Irrelevant outcome ‐ to evaluate the effects of computer‐aided diagnosis (CAD) on inter‐reader agreement in Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung‐RADS) categorisation |
Robbins 2019 | Irrelevant trial design |
Schabath 2019 | Irrelevant trial design |
Schreuder 2021 | Irrelevant trial design |
Spiro 2019 | Irrelevant intervention ‐ sputum cytology and cytometry versus usual care |
Strauss 2012 | Irrelevant trial design |
Strauss 2015 | Irrelevant trial design |
Sullivan 2019 | Irrelevant intervention‐ serum biomarker versus usual care |
Sullivan 2021 | Irrelevant intervention ‐ serum biomarker versus usual care |
Yang 2008 | Irrelevant intervention ‐ LDCT and serum biomarker versus usual care |
Yip 2013 | Irrelevant trial design |
CXR: chest x‐ray; LDCT: low‐dose computed tomography; RCT: randomised controlled trial