Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;2022:9870386. doi: 10.34133/2022/9870386

Table 3.

Comparison of reported parameters for switching ultrasound ASICs.

Parameter First-generation module Second-generation module [42] MPS MP4816 [43] Supertex HV2761 [41] Maxim MAX4805 [52]
Matrix 5 × 8 5 × 8 64 × 1 16 × 1 24 × 1 8 × 1
ASIC process 0.35 μm 0.35 μm 0.35 μm BiCMOS
Max VTX 38 Vpp 38 Vpp 50 Vpp 180 Vpp 200 Vpp 200 Vpp
TX Sw Ron 900 Ω 330 Ω 180 Ω 12.5 Ω 20 Ω 1.5 Ω
Glitch – XDCR 5 mVpp 0.3 mVpp
Glitch – 50 Ω 3 3 30 mVpp 300 mVpp
Off-isolation – XDCR -46 dB -46 dB -17 dB -30 dB
Off-isolation – 50 Ω -66 dB -60 dB
Cparasitic 1.5 pF 5 pF 11 pF 30 pF 3.5 pF
Receive bandwidth 4 MHz 10 MHz 70 MHz 45 MHz 44 MHz
Die/package 3.7 mm × 1.8 mm 4.5 mm × 1.9 mm 6 mm × 1.6 mm 7 mm × 7 mm 9 mm × 9 mm 5 mm × 5 mm
Power/channel 77 mW 24 mW2 63 μW1 1.7 mW1 8.5 mW

1OEM switching power calculated for 64 switch events in 32 ms. 2Current second-generation modules use +/-5 V for preamp supplies as opposed to the manufacturer suggested +/-2 V which makes the power greater than it should be. This will be corrected in future work. 3ASIC switch parameters for off-isolation and glitch level are not designed for 50 Ω operation and therefore were not measured with 50 Ω load.