Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 27;2022:4119912. doi: 10.1155/2022/4119912

Table 4.

Comparison of CEA and ProGRP levels in BALF of lung cancer patients with different CT imaging features (x¯±s).

CT imaging features n CEA (μg/L) t P ProGRP (pg/mL) t P
Lobulation sign (%) 0.889 0.376 2.494 0.014
 Yes 56 64.78 ± 12.87 151.70 ± 16.90
 No 34 62.29 ± 12.90 142.75 ± 15.82
Burr sign (%) 2.109 0.038 3.612 0.001
 Yes 34 67.43 ± 11.65 156.65 ± 15.14
 No 56 61.66 ± 13.11 143.26 ± 18.10
Vacuolation sign (%) -0.758 0.450 -0.694 0.489
 Yes 14 61.50 ± 10.03 145.25 ± 12.83
 No 76 64.27 ± 12.95 148.89 ± 18.78
Ground glass sign (%) 0.765 0.447 4.623 0.000
 Yes 39 65.02 ± 12.76 157.76 ± 16.28
 No 51 62.94 ± 12.81 141.10 ± 17.43
Pleural effusion (%) 2.614 0.011 2.900 0.005
 Yes 27 68.94 ± 10.43 156.20 ± 14.94
 No 63 61.65 ± 12.77 144.94 ± 17.63
Lesion diameter (%) 3.935 0.000 5.288 0.000
 ≥3.0 cm 32 71.08 ± 13.14 161.44 ± 15.00
 <3.0 cm 58 59.85 ± 12.86 141.08 ± 18.70