Dolapcioglu [97] |
2013 |
RCT |
104 |
simple EH (n = 61), atypical EH (n = 43) |
Oral MPA (10 mg/day; n = 52) vs. LNG-IUD (n = 52) both for 3–6 months; 2-year follow-up |
64% (MPA) vs. 100% (LNG-IUD) after 6 months |
22/51 (43%) for MPA vs. 4/51 (8%) for LNG-IUD after 2 years; 50% (MPA) vs. 84% (LNG-IUD) after 3 months |
– |
Orbo [98] |
2008 |
RCT |
258 |
EH without further differentiation |
LNG-IUD vs. oral progestin, observation for 6 months; follow-up for 24 months |
LNG-IUD more effective vs. oral progestins and observation after 6 months (p = 0.001) and after follow-up |
No case of EC during follow-up (56 to 108 months) |
– |
Ismail [99] |
2013 |
RCT |
90 |
EH without atypia |
Cyclical MPA 10 mg/day vs. cyclical NETA 15 mg/day vs. LNG-IUD for 6 months |
36.6% vs. 40% vs. 66.7% |
No case of EC |
– |
Karimi-Zarchi [100] |
2013 |
RCT |
40 |
EH without atypia |
Cyclical MPA 20 mg/day vs. LNG-IUD for 3 months |
LNG-IUD more effective (p < 0.05) |
– |
Better satisfaction; less side effects with LNG-IUD |
El-Behery [101] |
2015 |
RCT |
138 |
EH without further differentiation; diagnosed by ultrasound |
Oral dydrogesterone vs. LNG-IUD for 6 months |
LNG-IUD more effective (96% vs. 80%) |
Recurrence rate lower with LNG-IUD (0% vs. 12%) |
Patient satisfaction better with LNG-IUD despite more spotting |
Orbo [102]; Update of [98] |
2016 |
RCT |
153 |
EH without further differentiation |
LNG-IUD vs. oral progestin vs. observation for 6 months; follow-up for 24 months |
– |
Histological recurrence in 55/135 (41%) with CR; Recurrence rates similar in three therapy groups; recurrence dependent on menopausal status (p = 0.0005) and estrogen level (p = 0.0007) |
– |
Pooled analysis |
– |
RCT (n = 6 including one Update) |
783 |
– |
– |
LNG-IUD with higher rates vs. oral progestins in all studies |
LNG-IUD with lower rates of persistence/recurrence in 2 studies |
Less side effects with LNG-IUD in 1 study; better patient satisfaction in 2 studies |