Table 3.
Comparison of computational values of Sherwood number for various K, Sc and t obtained by Asogwa et.al50, Seth et. Al51, Kataria and Patel52 and present authors.
| K | Sc | T | Asogwa et. al50 (isothermal condition) | Seth et. al51 (isothermal condition) | Kataria and Patel52 (isothermal condition) | Present study (isothermal condition) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0.66 | 0.4 | 1.8320 | 1.8320 | 1.8320 | 1.8320 |
| 5.1 | 0.66 | 0.4 | 1.8493 | 1.8493 | 1.8493 | 1.8493 |
| 5.2 | 0.66 | 0.4 | 1.8664 | 1.8664 | 1.8664 | 1.8664 |
| 5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.8867 | 1.8867 | 1.8867 | 1.8867 |
| 5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2.0170 | 2.0170 | 2.0170 | 2.0170 |
| 5 | 0.66 | 0.5 | 1.8238 | 1.8238 | 1.8238 | 1.8238 |
| 5 | 0.66 | 0.6 | 1.8201 | 1.8201 | 1.8201 | 1.8201 |
| 5 | 1.24 | 0.4 | 2.5111 | – | – | 2.5117 |
| 5 | 2.01 | 0.4 | 3.1971 | – | – | 3.1971 |