Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 21;1(3):88–96. doi: 10.14744/hf.2020.2020.0026

Table 4.

The effects of coffee type on liver enzymes and liver histology

Turkish (n=31) Granulated (n=6) Filtered (n=2) Combination (n=93) Total (n=132) p
Age (Y) 48.0±10.6 42.0±9.4 40.2±12.1 42.4±9.9 43.8±11.1 0.409
Sex [M (%)] 13 (41.9) 3 (50.0) 1 (50.0) 44 (47.3) 61 (46.2) 0.110
BMI (kg/m2) 25.2±4.1 25±4.6 27.1±5.0 26.8±6.4 26.1 ±5.8 0.206
Liver enzymes
ALT (U/L) 39.7±11.6 40.2±9.6 26.5±9.9 31.9±12.0 33.3±11.8 0.104
AST (U/L) 29.5±10.0 38.7±11.9 22.1±13.2 24±11.8 25.9±10.9 0.322
Steatosis on liver USG 15 (48.3) 4(66.6) 1 (50.0) 49 (52.6) 69/132 (52.2) 0.304
TE findings for Non-NASH
TE LSM (kPa) 5.88±2.01 5.93±2.87 4.66± 2.44 5.62±2.09 5.84±2.06 0.102
TE CAP (dB/m) 202.91±80.5 206.15±66.9 208.053±55.2 198.18±93.9 201.04±90.3 0.092
Liver histology for NASH
NAS score 5.84± 0.34 5.83±0.75 5.76±0.87 5.73±0.81 5.78±0.95 0.198
Fibrosis score 2.18±0.38 1.98±0.76 1.87±0.11 1.62±0.17 1.95±0.41 0.055

Y: Year; M: Male; BMI: Body mass index; USG: Ultrasonography; TE: Transient elastography; LSM: Liver stiffness measure; CAP: Controlled attenuation parameter; NAS: NAFLD activity score. Results expressed as number (%) or median (range) unless specified otherwise. P-value for comparison of all groups.