Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 22;8(1):e10356. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10356

TABLE 1.

Evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection technology

Subjects that based Method Reaction time Advantages Disadvantages
Diagnostic Medical Imaging CT About 1 h More accurate in determining disease status Cannot be distinguished from other viral pneumonia
Artificial intelligence: CT combined with algorithm‐based deep learning Same as CT Diagnostic capability based on continuous optimization of algorithms AI recognition models need to pass a certain time in training, and the technical requirements are high
Nucleic acid‐based molecular biology diagnostics Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) 1–2 days Can display the complete genome and effectively identify mutant strains Need for well‐equipped laboratories and knowledgeable laboratory staff
qRT‐PCR 1–2 days

Gold standard: High specificity and sensitivity

Quantitative and qualitative

High rate of false negatives, and has experimental operation and cost requirements
RT‐LAMP 30–60 min Simple reaction conditions, Suitable for point‐of‐care testing (POCT) Primer design is complicated
CRISPR‐Cas system 30–60 min Suitable for point‐of‐care testing (POCT) Possible “off‐target” phenomenon can affect the judgment of the test results
Serological diagnosis based on antigen–antibody Colloidal gold immunolateral flow chromatography 15–20 min Suitable for point‐of‐care testing (POCT), Result visualization Window period exists for early detection, Cross‐reactivity with other viruses
ELISA 4–6 h Enables amplification of virus and antibody signals Poor repeatability, Easy to contaminate