Table 1.
Study characteristics.
| Study | Country | Study design | No. of patients with breast cancer | No. of controls | No. of patients with breast cancer with tonsils removed | No. of controls with tonsils removed | Risk measurement | Risk of bias |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brasky et al. (16) | USA | Case control | 736 | 801 | 389 | 380 | Adj OR | High quality |
| Gross et al. (11) | USA | Case control | 110 | 200 | 22 | 46 | NR | Very high risk |
| Howie et al. (12) | Scotland | Case control | 149 | 478 | 54 | 117 | NR | High risk |
| Kessler et al. (13) | USA | Case control | 89 | 85 | 29 | 20 | NR | Very high risk |
| Lubin et al. (14) | Canada | Case control | 558 | 824 | 286 | 384 | Adj OR | High risk |
| Sun et al. (17) | Taiwan | R. Cohort | 440a | 1760b | 7 | 14c | IRR | High quality |
| Yasui et al. (15) | USA | Case control | 537 | 492 | 362 | 314 | Adj OR | High quality |
| Cassimos et al. (10) | Greece | Case control | 52 | 255 | 2 | 31 | NR | Very high risk |
a, number of patients with tonsillectomy; b, number of patients without tonsillectomy; c, number of patients with breast cancer without tonsils removed.Adj OR, Adjusted Odds Ratio; IRR, Incidence Rate Ratio; NR, Not Reported; R. Cohort, Retrospective Cohort.