Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 20;13:901362. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901362

TABLE 1.

Effect size for the satisfaction decrease in the parents’ and non-parents’ samples.

Estimates
Measures K N g (SE) 95% CI LL 95% CI UL τ 2 Q I2 (%)
First year
Parent sample
Women satisfaction change 50 139,791 –0.31*** (0.03) –0.38 –0.25 0.01 528.16*** 90.91
Men satisfaction change 45 4,625 –0.29*** (0.03) –0.36 –0.22 0.04 238.65*** 81.56
Couple satisfaction change 3 291 –0.28* (0.08) –0.62 –0.06 0.01 4.73 57.71
Non-parent samplea
Women satisfaction change 4 165 –0.12* (0.04) –0.24 –0.01 0.00 .73 0
Men satisfaction change 4 165 –0.13* (0.04) –0.24 –0.02 0.00 .71 0
Second year
Parent sample
Women satisfaction change 15 136,337 –0.16*** (0.02) –0.24 –0.12 0.00 158.47*** 91.17
Men satisfaction change 11 1,445 –0.14* (0.06) –0.27 –0.02 0.03 46.19*** 78.35
Fist 2 years
Total satisfaction change 26 137,779 –0.37** (0.04) –0.43 –0.32 0.01 367.29*** 93.19

K, number of effect sizes; N, sample size; g, Hedge’s g; CI, confidence interval; Q, ratio of variation to within-study error; τ2 and I2, between-study variance. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

aOne study did not differentiate between mothers and fathers and was not included in the analysis.