Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct;158:106001. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106001

Table 2.

Household and individual characteristics of respondents, by sex of respondent and FAARM intervention group.

Women
Men
Control Intervention Control Intervention
% or mean % or mean % or mean % or mean
Education1
No education 19% 19% 37% 37%
Partial primary 22% 23% 19% 18%
Complete primary 24% 18% 17% 19%
Any secondary education 35% 40% 27% 26%



Household wealth tercile1#
Lower 44% 41% 45% 42%
Middle 35% 37% 35% 37%
Upper 20% 23% 19% 21%



Other household characteristics
Hindu1 29% 27% 31% 26%
Nuclear family at baseline1 40% 44% 40% 43%
Nuclear family at pro-WEAI2 59% 55% 59% 54%



Mean of continuous variables
Age in years1 25.0 24.9 33.1 33.4
Years since marriage1 7.0 7.2 6.9 7.1
Household members2 5.4 5.8 5.4 5.9



Decisions made by women*1
Food preparation 72% 78%
Major purchases 28% 29%
Daily purchases 55% 52%
Own healthcare 26% 25%



Mobility (last month)*1
Market 4% 3%
Health facility 8% 7%
Community meeting 2% 0%
Relative's or friend's house 23% 19%

The FAARM trial was undertaken in Habiganj District, Sylhet Division, Bangladesh. n = 885 except for where *n = 883 due to missing information.

# Wealth terciles are constructed for the FAARM study population as a whole and weighted by household size.

1 Data source: FAARM baseline survey (March–May 2015).

2 Data source: pro-WEAI survey (April–May 2019).