Table 3.
Pro-WEAI scores, by sex of respondent and FAARM intervention group.
| Control |
Intervention |
Difference |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Women | Men | Women | Men | Women | Men |
| Number of observations | 227 | 209 | 230 | 219 | ||
| Three domains of empowerment (3DE) score | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.16 | 0.03 |
| % empowered | 4% | 19% | 24% | 25% | 20% | 6% |
| Mean 3DE score for not yet empowered | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.09 | 0.01 |
| Number of dual-adult households | 205 | 215 | ||||
| % with gender parity | 29% | 54% | 25% | |||
| Average agency gap | 0.34 | 0.26 | −0.08 | |||
| Gender Parity Index (GPI) | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.12 | |||
| Pro-WEAI score | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.17 | |||
The FAARM trial was undertaken in Habiganj District, Sylhet Division, Bangladesh. n = 885.