Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 2;12(8):e049421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049421

Table 2.

General characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Characteristics No. (%) of articles (n=185) OR (95% CI)
Total (%) Abstract contains spin Unadjusted Adjusted
Article mentions adherence to PRISMA
 No 106 (17.8) 36 (19.5) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
 Yes 79 (42.7) 23 (12.4) 0.67 (0.34 to 1.32) 0.42 (0.16 to 1.07)
Publishing journal recommends adherence to PRISMA
 No 124 (67.0) 43 (23.2) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
 Yes 61 (33) 16 (8.6) 0.80 (0.43 to 1.50) 0.65 (0.29 to 1.46)
Funding source
 Not funded 44 (23.8) 16 (8.6) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
 Industry 11 (5.9) 4 (2.2) 1.00 (0.25 to 3.95) 1.27 (0.23 to 7.04)
 Not mentioned 93 (50.3) 26 (14.1) 0.68 (0.32 to 1.46) 0.62 (0.23 to 1.64)
 Private 20 (10.8) 7 (3.8) 0.94 (0.31 to 2.85) 0.86 (0.23 to 3.17)
 Public 17 (9.2) 6 (3.2) 0.95 (0.30 to 3.07) 0.96 (0.24 to 3.76)
AMSTAR-2 rating
 High 24 (13) 7 (3.8) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
 Moderate 110 (59.5) 7 (3.8) 1.13 (0.32 to 3.98) 0.93 (0.23 to 3.87)
 Low 29 (15.7) 12 (6.5) 1.71 (0.54 to 5.41) 1.68 (0.44 to 6.49)
 Critically low 110 (59.5) 33 (17.8) 1.04 (0.39 to 2.75) 1.19 (0.38 to 3.77)
Journal impact factor*, M (SD) 7.80 (11.52) 6.90 (8.45) 0.99 (0.96 to 1.02) 1.01 (0.97 to 1.05)
Publication year (1991–2020) 1.05 (1.00 to 1.11) 1.09 (1.00 to 1.18)

*18 journals did not have an impact factor.

AMSTAR, A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.