Skip to main content
letter
. 2022 Jul 19;119(31):e2200300119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2200300119

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

RoBMAPSMA model-averaged posterior mean effect size estimates with 95% credible intervals and Bayes factors for the absence of the effect for the combined sample or split by either the domain or intervention category (ignoring the clustering of SEs). BF01 quantifies evidence for the null hypothesis. BF01 larger than one corresponds to evidence in favor of the null hypothesis, and BF01 lower than one corresponds to evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis (evidence for the alternative hypothesis can be obtained by reciprocating the Bayes factor; BF10 = 1/BF01). As a rule of thumb, Bayes factors between 3 and 10 indicate moderate evidence, and Bayes factors larger than 10 indicate strong evidence.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure