Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 15;119(31):e2204336119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2204336119

Table 1.

Peak antibody levels subsequent to vaccination and natural infection

Stimulus Subjects IgG antibody Day* Peak†, Study
mRNA-1273 10 anti-S1 35 1.59125597 (39)
mRNA-1273 52 anti-S 28 1.421908903 (47)
mRNA-1273 8 anti-RBD 14 1.421860374 (46)
mRNA-1273 29 anti-S 14 1.481656668 (39)
mRNA-1273 40 anti-RBD 28 1.534648493 (42)
mRNA-1273 199 anti-S 28 1.551304142 (43)
Mean (across studies) 24.5 1.500439092
BNT162b2 21 anti-S1 21 (39)
BNT162b2 119 anti-S 28 (47)
BNT162b2 109 anti-S 28 (44)
BNT162b2 3 anti-S 14 (48)
BNT162b2 29 anti-S 28 (40)
BNT162b2 54 anti-S 21 (45)
BNT162b2 21 anti-RBD 14 (46)
BNT162b2 50 anti-RBD 28 (42)
BNT162b2 100 anti-S 28 (43)
BNT162b2 3808 anti-RBD 30 (49)
BNT162b2 231 anti-RBD 7 (50)
BNT162b2 309 anti-S 14 (51)
BNT162b2 379 anti-S 0–29 (52)
BNT162b2 1256 anti-S 37 1.500037185 (14)
Mean (across studies) 22.7 1.500037185
Natural infection 1797 anti-S1 34 1.00000 (53)
Natural infection 264 anti-S1 28 1.00000 (36)
Natural infection 145 anti-S1 56 1.00000 (37)
Natural infection 272 anti-S 40 1.00000 (14)
Mean (across studies) 39.5 1.00000
ChAdOx1 29 anti-S1 35 0.886550776 (39)
ChAdOx1 39 anti-S 28 1.125027225 (47)
ChAdOx1 104 anti-S 28 1.136666043 (44)
ChAdOx1 77 anti-S 14 to 21 1.250836015 (45)
Mean (across studies) 25.2 1.099770015
Ad26.COV2.S 15 anti-S 56 0.974409364 (40)
Ad26.COV2.S 75 anti-S 56 0.953157648 (43)
Ad26.COV2.S 13 anti-RBD 56 0.830522868 (42)
Mean (across studies)§ 56 0.919363294

*Days after final vaccine dose (second dose for mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and ChAdOx1 or singular dose for Ad26.COV2.S) or average days post-symptom onset for natural infection.

Reference values versus natural infection, against which all other vaccines were compared.

Value for natural infection assigned to equal 1.

§Antibody levels reported for Ad26.COV2.S by Horndler and colleagues (38) were not included in our quantification of the peak antibody level relative to natural infection for Ad26.COV2.S because the sampling of subjects was timed such that measurements did not necessarily represent the peak of response.

Average number of participants across sampling duration from Israel and colleagues (53).