Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 3;42(31):6069–6089. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0467-22.2022

Table 2.

Database and cell classification during reach

General classification EP GPe Total
Total number of analyzed cells 81 35 116
Task-related cells (contralateral or ipsilateral) 75 26 101
Task-related cells (contralateral reach) 68 23 91
Task-related cells (ipsilateral reach) 60 15 75
Task-related cells (contralateral and ipsilateral reach) 52 13 65
Periods of task-related activity during contralateral reach 137
Classification during contralateral reach EP (68) Gpe (23) Total (91)
Cells with significant change in activity in transport phase 27 (40%) 13 (56%) 40 (44%)
Dynamic increase 9 3 12
Dynamic decrease 7 5 12
Tonic 11 5 16
Cells with significant change in activity during lever press 40 (59%) 13 (56%) 53 (58%)
Dynamic increase 24 10 34
Dynamic decrease 7 2 9
Tonic increase 3 1 4
Tonic decrease 6 0 6
Go-related cells 12 (18%) 6 (26%) 18 (20%)
Defined by linear regression and/or variance 10 4 14
Defined on the bases of a short latency modification 2 2 4
Cells with significant changes during the cue period 6 (9%) 2 (9%) 8 (9%)
Cells with significant changes during the late period 19 (21%)

Number of cells recorded in the EP and GPe that showed significant modification of their activity during contralateral and ipsilateral reaches together with a detailed tabulation of the number of cells discharging at different times during the contralateral reach. Values in brackets indicate the number of cells as a percentage of the total number of task-related cells in the EP (N = 68), in the GPe (N = 23), or regardless of the localization of the cell (total, N = 91). Note that many cells discharged during multiple periods of the task, so total numbers are >91, and total percentage is >100. The lines in italics define different classes of cells as used in the text.