Table 1. A summary of the literature review showing the past techniques and their limitations.
Authors | Task | Models | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|
Ameri et. al., [14] | Classification, segmentation | CNN | i. Further experimentation of proposed model’s parameters is absent. ii. Absence of image pre-processing and data augmentation technique |
Manu Goyal et. al., [15] |
segmentation | Mask R-CNN DeeplabV3+ | i. Lack of ablation study on proposed model ii. Lack of image processing and data augmentation techniques that might have given better accuracy |
Kharazmi et. al., [16] |
Classification | Feature extraction Random forest |
i. No eliminatation of artefacts (bubble) that are present in the images ii. Absence of ablation study in proposed model |
Albahar et. al., [17] |
Classification | CNN model with novel regularizer | i. Lack of ablation study in proposed model |
Sikkander et. al.. [18] | Segmentation Classification | ANFC | i. Experimentations with other deep learning models is absent. |
Sagar et.al., [20] |
Classification | CNN | i. Absence of image preprocessing techniques ii. Use of a specific optimizer and learning rate |
Ashraf et. al., [21] | Segmentation | YOLOv4 | i. Lack of artefacts removal techniques ii. Use of a specific optimizer and learning rate |
Wei et. al., [23] | Classification | CNN | i. Size of input image is too large requiring higher resources ii. Experimentations with various loss functions is absent |