Skip to main content
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences logoLink to Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
. 2022 Jul 25;29(9):103395. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103395

Population dynamics and fecundity estimates of Long-spined Black Sea Urchin Diadema savignyi (Audouin, 1890) from the Red Sea, Saudi Arabia

Mohammed Othman Aljahdali 1,, Mohammad Habibur Rahman Molla 1
PMCID: PMC9352549  PMID: 35935102

Abstract

Sea Urchin is not only the crucial keystone species for the coral reef restoration but also it has antimicrobial and anti-cancer activities. This study undertaken to focus on length weight relationship, size fecundity distribution and the estimation of fecundity from the long-spined Sea Urchin, Diadema savignyi at the coastal water of the middle Red Sea, Saudi Arabia. A total of 633 specimen of D. savignyi has been collected from the coastal water of Obhur Creak during the sampling time. In each species, total length (TL) measured as a TW = 11.908 × 0.9995 (R2 = 0.8975) through the linear regression graph and digital slide callipers and, individual body weight estimated by the digital balance. The natural and fishing mortality 2.02/yr and 0.19/yr respectively has documented from study area. The Asymptotic length value (L∞) (cm) were estimated 7.35 where the growth coefficient (K) was 0.67 from the monthly length-frequency numeric data by using FAO FISAT II software for generating and estimating the population parameters and age. However, the recruitment pattern was observed to be increased gradually with the maximum recruitment peak between the months of September and October 2021. Therefore, the estimation of fecundity varied from 49,226 ova (total length 3.1 cm) to 466,133 ova (total length 6.8). As a result, analysis of the relationship between the absolute fecundity (F) and total length (TL), and between the fecundity and drained body weight (DW), revealed a linear regression model with a positive and significant relationship at p < 0.05. This is the first approach to study the detailed population dynamic of the ecologically and economically important tropical long spine sea urchin (D. savignyi) endemic to the region. However, the result so far obtained from this research would greatly be useful towards the understanding of the detailed population structure and growth patterns that will undoubtedly help us to develop captive breeding, seed production, culture protocols, conservation strategies and isolation bioactive compounds of this high-valued species incommensurate with national and international perspectives.

Keywords: Total length and weight, Mortality, Fecundity, Stock Assessment, Red Sea, Saudi Arabia

1. Introduction

The sea urchin, Echinodermata: Echinoidea, is an important marine bioresource to be used in many scientific fields including biology, ecology, biodiversity, aquaculture, conservation, and evolution (Farina et al., 2020). However, they are also used as raw material for the production of food, particularly the product of processing the gonads of sea urchins known as “Sea Urchin Roe” or “Uni,” which is considered a valuable delicacy in Asia, the Mediterranean, and the Western Hemisphere (Rahman et al., 2013). Due to its geographical location in the southern Indian Ocean, the Arabian Gulf is also considered a focal point for the emergence of many diverged taxa, making it known for its unique culture and stunning marine environment (Sale et al., 2011). There are unique coastal and marine environments in the Gulf region, including the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aqaba, the Gulf of Suez, and the Gulf of Aden, not least of which is the extraordinary system of coral reefs, invertebrates and their associated animals and plants (Fine et al., 2019). Nevertheless, there are also extensive shallow shelves, noted for their marine life and corals. The red sea is the habitat of over 1,200 species of fish 1,000 invertebrate species, and 200 soft and hard corals (Atta et al., 2019). However, the Red sea, Arabian Gulf and Indian Ocean faunas have received more attention than the Gulf coast of Oman. In the past, the echinoderm fauna has explored through the ecological survey and relatively unexplored region was documented (Dibattista et al., 2016). Among these highly endemic fauna, recently found around greater than 20 species of sea urchins in the coral reef communities of the Gulf regions, such as Tripnuestes gratilla, Diadema setosum, D. savignyi, Echinothrix diadema, Toxopneustes pileolus, Echinometra mathaei, Echinothrix calamaris, Salmacis bicolor, Heterocentrotus mammillatus, Prionocidaris pistillaris, Stomopneustes variolaris, Microcyphus rousseaui, Echinostrephus molaris, Echinoneus cyclostomus, Asthenosoma marisrubri, Asthenosoma varium, Prionocidaris baculosa, Phyllacanthus imperialis, Echinodiscus auritus, Lovenia elongata, Clypeaster spp. Etc (Zeina, Darweesh and Hellal, 2016). Some of the commercially, biologically and ecologically important species of regular echinoid sea urchins are included. Among them, the most commercial species of regular sea urchin, T. gratilla and D. savignyi are found abundantly in the Gulf of Aqaba and the North-western parts of Red Sea (Guirguis, 2010).

The tropical echinoid (D. savignyi) are mostly abundant and ecologically important species in the Red Sea, Saudi Arabia (Guirguis, 2010). However, they usually inhibit the intertidal zone where depth and pressure are not high. It is also found in the shallow water body of the east coast of Africa, Indo-Pacific region, and western Indian Ocean. It has been habituated in sandy flats and coral reef areas of warm water near coasts. D. savignyi has included long spines with a round body and black anal sac (O’Loughlin, 1998). It can grow to 90 mm in diameter with colour of solid blue or green lines on the body wall. The male and female D. savignyi lay eggs in the water column at the same days and finally it turns into a pluteus larvae. It usually lay about millions of eggs in once a month during lunar cycle (Rahman et al., 2012). The development of D. savignyi has been depended on the water temperature, food availability and salinity. It is considered for ecologically important herbivores through the control and stability of algae and coral reef. Algal blooms occurred in the Caribbean reef due to the declined of Diadema species by outbreaking of diseases between 1983 and 1984 as well as the overfishing of herbivorous fishes (Myhre and Acevedo-Gutiérrez, 2007).

The density of sea urchin has been played an important role for the structure dynamics of algal and coral reef communities that affected the biomass and distribution of macro algae and coral. Sea urchin has been regarding as an omnivorous that intake algae and controlling the algal distribution in the shallow reef. It can be taken invertebrates such as zoanthids, sponges, and coral tissues that affecting the coral recruitment and mortality. Sea urchin deposited sediment in the reef regions and fulfil the important ecological roles that considered it as a keystone species. It is one of the major bioeroder in the oceanic system (Sangil and Guzman, 2016).

In the modern era, sea urchin used to evaluate field such as ecology, biology, and evolution. Sea urchin gonads are well known for nutrients and their delicacy, and the shell of sea urchin used not only as a raw material but also directly used as ornamental product of many ways. Sea urchin gonad has an anticancer and inflammatory activity, and it has been used as remedy to control body condition, provided sexual strength of men and treatment of diseases. The bioactive compounds have isolated from the sea urchin gonads such as polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). It has been applied to treat arrhythmia, cardiovascular and cancer diseases for a recent decade (Solari et al., 2021).

Feeding ecology of sea urchins are well known for intaking algae. Although, temperate and sub-tropical regions seagrass are the common source of nutrition, and it is considered a minor source for feeding of sea urchin. Sea urchin have been balancing the algae community in the coral reef and costal area by grazing and protecting algal bloom in the ocean water. Furthermore, the interaction of sea urchin and marine algae were not fully understood in Brazilian waters that observed low number of algae in their gut contents (Cordeiro, Harborne and Ferreira, 2020). However, sea urchin exhibited a high degree of food selectivity in the area where they usually lived. Food intake may differ in summer and winter based on calory content. Therefore, the somatic index and reproductive growth have a good relationship with feeding ecology of sea urchin (Siikavuopio et al., 2007).

They are commonly inhabited shallow-water coral reefs in the benthic region of the sea floor, making up over 50 % of the overall number of urchins in the rocky area and over 90 % on the calcareous pavement as they reach an average peak density of 70.3–87 /m2 and grooves on the 88 calcareous pavement at water depth of 1.5 m (Labbé-Bellas et al., 2016). However, some urchins can 89 occur at a depth ranging between 0 and 90 m in shallow water amongst seagrass meadows and 90 muddy sublittoral zone (Rahman et al., 2013). The purple sea urchin, for instance, thrives well 91 in the midst of strong wave surge and churning aerated water (Hakim et al., 2019).

Sea urchin research is very recent in Saudi Arabia and few systematic works have been done with distribution, but no work has been yet conducted on the feeding ecology, population dynamics and characteristics and gonadal index with the species of D. savignyi. Due to the high of nutritional, pharmaceutical and neurocritical values of sea urchin gonads and shell, it is very essential to utilize the population dynamics, growth pattern, and reproductive system of the highly endemic sea urchin fauna in the Saudi Arabia coastal waters (Mos, Byrne and Dworjanyn, 2016). The present study has been undertaken to determine the size frequency distribution length-weight relationship, fecundity, and population characteristics of D. savignyi in Obhur, Saudi Arabia.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study area

The study was conducted in Sharm Obhur (Obhur creak) island near Obhur region of north Jeddah seashore, Red Sea. The Obhur island (Sharm Obhur) have degraded environmentally at least 11 km length by the human activities (Guirguis, 2010). The area was selected to observe the sea urchin population characteristic and fecundity estimation (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Location of sampling area at Obhur region of north Jeddah seashore, Red Sea.

2.2. Sample collection and maintenance

The length and weight data from the monthly samples of the commercially important sea urchin (D. savignyi) was collected from the northern (middle) area of the Red Sea, Saudi Arabia between January, and December 2021. It lies between the latitude of 21°71′03′'N and longitude of 39°09′60′'E. A mesh bag attached to a maypole was used by divers for collection. The collected sea urchin has transported to the laboratory of biology, King Abdulaziz University immediately and were maintained in aerated closed aquarium before use for the experiment.

2.3. Length-weight measurement

The Each live individual specimen of D. savignyi was documented to the nearest 0.01 mm (Total Length) by using the digital vernier calliper and weighed to the nearest 0.01 g using for the electric balance.

2.4. Fecundity estimation

The various mature size of female D. savignyi were chosen for the measurement of fecundity based on their size (g). The total length of sea urchin has been documented by digital scale and drain weight were measured. The gonad of D. savignyi were collected by injecting 0.5 M KCL until the seeding all eggs (Dautov, Dautova and Kashenko, 2020). Three replications were taken during the estimation of total fecundity from the 60 matures female sea urchin (D. savignyi). After the collection of eggs, it has diluted by fresh saline water and 0.1 mL aliquot of the egg suspension were counted under a compound microscope.

2.5. Data analysis

The data were analysed using FISAT (FAO-ICLARM Stock Assessment Tools) software. The best growth curve in arriving fitted curve through the maximum number of patterns of the length-frequency distribution was based on the ELEFAN I procedure. With the aid of the best growth curve, the Von Bertalanffy growth function (VBGF) parameters (L) and (K) were calculated (Elganainy and Amin, 2012) and the resulting values were used to estimate the growth performance index (φ) in terms of length growth of (D. savignyi) using the following formula:

φ=Log10K+2Log10L

The linear relationship W = aLb was applied to achieve the length-weight relationship. W, L, (a) and (b) represents the weight, the total length, the intercept and the relative growth rate or the slope respectively. The least squares linear graph regression on log–log transformed data were used to estimate the values of (a) and (b) parameters as Log10W = Log10a + bLog10L. The coefficient of determinant (r2) was used as an indicator the quality of the linear regression (Schneider, Hommel and Blettner, 2010). In addition, the statistical significance level r2 and 95 % confidence intervals of the parameters (a) and (b) were estimated.

To find the length of the D. savignyi at any ages, the inverse Von Bertalanffy growth equation was used (Spence and Turtle, 2017). Then, the non-linear squares estimation method was used in fitting VBGF to estimate the length-at-age curve. The Von Bertalanffy growth function formula:

E=FZ=FF+M

where Lt, L∞, K, t, and t0 are respectively represent the mean length at age t, the asymptotic length, the growth coefficient, the age of the specimens and the hypothetical age at which the length is zero (Grandcourt, Abdessalaam and Francis, 2006).

Length converted catch curve was used to compute the total mortality (Z) whereas the empirical relationship was used to calculate the natural mortality (M):

Log10M = -0.0066 – 0.279log10L∞ + 0.6543 log10K + 0.4634 log10T.

Definitions of the above parameters remain the same with T representing mean annual habitat water temperature. After computing the Z and M values, which are the total mortality and natural mortality respectively, the fishing mortality (F) value was easily estimated using the linear relationship:

F=Z-M

However, the estimated values of the above expression make it possible to reckon the exploitation level (E) of D. savignyi using the equation:

E=FZ=FF+M

The retrograde projection of the set of available length-frequency data on the length axis as clarified in FiSAT II was used in discovering the recruitment pattern of the stock (Lassen and Medley, n.d.). The relative strength of pulse and number of pulses per year was determined by series of length-frequency data using the parameter L, K and t0 (t0 = 0) described above. The NORMSEP procedure in FiSAT II was also used to determine the Normal distribution of the recruitment patterns (Pauly and Soriano, 1986). Furthermore, The SPSS version 16.1.0 was used to calculate the population structure and length frequency data of D. savignyi.

3. Result

3.1. Sample collection and measurement

A total number of 633 live D. savignyi specimens were collected during the entire experimental period and each individual was measured to the nearest 0.05 mm for total length (TL) using vernier calliper and weighed to nearest 0.01 g for the total weight (TW) using digital electronic balance (Table 1). However, the asymptotic length value (L∞) (cm) was 7.35 where growth coefficient was 0.67 (Table 2).

Table 1.

Monthly pooled length-frequency data of D. savignyi from the coastal waters of the northern (middle), Red sea during the one-year experimental period between January and December 2021.

SI Jan Feb March Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1.5 1 1 1
2 1 1 1 1
2.5 1 1 1 1 1
3 1 1
3.5 2 1 1 2 2 1
4.5 1 1 1 7 1 15 6 5
5 1 3 1 19 4 35 37 20 15
5.5 3 3 5 7 13 5 21 17 1 17 2 8
6 21 15 15 20 32 13 6 17 1 4 2 8
6.5 20 16 21 21 6 16 15 1 16
7 4 10 10 2 10 1 1 6
7.5 1 2 1 1 1 1
Total 54 51 54 53 52 49 53 57 54 58 35 64

Table 2.

Population parameters of sea urchin (D. savignyi) in the coastal water of the northern (middle) area, Red sea, Saudi Arabia.

Parameters Diadema savignyi
Asymptotic length value (L∞) (cm) 7.35
Growth coefficient or constant (K) per year 0.67
Natural mortality estimation(M) 2.02
Fishing mortality (F) per year 0.19
Total mortality (Z) per year 2.23
Exploitation (E) 0.09
Length range (cm) 1.5–7.5
Sample number 634
Average temperature (°C) 28
Growth performance (φ) 2.70
Potential longevity (tmax = 5/K) years 2.40

3.2. Population structure of D. Savignyi

3.2.1. Size structure and length-weight relationship

The scattered plot shows the length-weight relationships of D. savignyi from the northern (middle) area in the Red sea, Saudi Arabia where length on the X-axis and weight on the Y-axis. However, the parameters such as growth constant (a) and relative growth rate were estimated to be 0.9995 and 11.908, respectively. The equation TW = 11.908TL0.9995 was obtained at the end of the result. The biometric relationship displayed a positive correlation between length and weight (R2 = 0.8975). (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Length weight relationship of D. savignyi from in the coastal water of northern (middle) area, Red sea, Saudi Arabia.

3.3. Population parameters and stock status of D. Savignyi

3.3.1. Growth parameters

The growth curve of a pooled length size distribution of D. savignyi is shown in Table 1. The growth parameters of Von Bertalanffy growth formula were estimated as asymptotic length (L∞) = 7.35 cm and growth coefficient (K) = 0.67 yr−1 (Table 2). The values of L∞ and K were used for the calculation of growth performance index (φ' = Log10K + 2Log10L), which was found to be 2.70 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The growth performance index (φ'- phi prime) of sea urchin (D. savignyi).

The estimation of growth coefficient (K) per year has been utilized after the direct fit of length frequency data (ELEFAN 1). This value also showed the presence of a range of length-classes of D. savignyi that were captured is belongs to two cohort’s seasons. The black and white bars in the restructured length-frequency distribution are positive and negative deviations from the weighted moving average. The potential longevity (tmax = 5/K) was estimated as 2.40 years indicating that the D. savignyi can live for not more than 6.5 years in the habitat where the study was carried out (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Growth curve of D. savignyi by ELEFAN 1 superimposed on the restructured length-frequency diagram (L∞ = 12.38 cm and K = 1.7/yr.).

3.4. Mortality and exploitation rate

The percentage of a fishstock's population or biomass that is taken out annually is known as its exploitation rate, and it is often quantified by fishing mortality. The distribution of fishing mortality throughout the population's age or length composition is referred to as the “exploitation pattern”. The total mortality estimetted values of Z = 2.26 for D. savignyi through the analysis of length converted catch curve (Fig. 5). However, the estimition of natural and fishing mortaly were 2.04/yr and 0.22/yr respectively during the average temperature of 28 °C. The determination of exploitation level of D. savignyi was not high in the Obhur Creak (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Length-converted catch curve of D. savignyi in the coastal water of middle area, Red sea, Saudi Arabia.

3.5. Recruitment pattern of D. Savignyi

The recruitment pattern of sea urchin (D. savignyi) has been observed throughout the study, hence the maximum recruitment peak found on the month between September and October 2021. The highest peak of recruitment at almost 19 % showed on October where the minimum percentage of recruitment was initiate (<1%) in May 2021 (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Recruitment pattern of D. savignyi in the coastal water of northern (middle) area, Red sea, Saudi Arabia from January to December 2021.

The fallouts of the length-structured VPA of D. savignyi together with the length-weight relationship is depicted in Fig. 7. The result indicates that the fishing mortality was at a very minimal rate at 4.5 cm mid-length group and the highest mortality rate of 0.8 was at 6.5 cm mid-length group. The survival rate was high at minimum length and a sharp decline as the length increases. However, the fishing mortality was comparatively low over mid lengths from 1.5 cm to 3.5 cm and the values were higher from 5.5 cm to 6.5 cm mid-length (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Length structured virtual population analysis (VPA) of D. savignyi in the coastal water of northern (middle) area, Red Sea, Saudi Arabia.

The exploitation rate of D. savignyi was estimated to be E = 0. 42 /yr. The results revealed that the stock is underfished based on the assumption from Guland (1983) that an optimum exploitation of a stock become apparent when E = 0.5 or when fishing mortality equal to total mortality of the species. The empirical estimated result (E = 0.42 /yr.) could be associated with both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Nevertheless, high demand, as well as continuous harvesting and unstrained exportation of the species show a likelihood of overexploitation and depletion of T. gratilla stocks in the future. Fig. 8 represents the relative yield per recruit and biomass per recruit of the species at ogive option of E50 = 0.42 yr−1.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Relative yield per recruit and biomass per recruit curves for D. savignyi in the Obhur Creak, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

3.6. Cumulative probability of capture

The predicted highest length of D. savignyi value and 95 % confidence interval are generated from the intersection of overall highest converted length at the various in lines shown in Fig. 9. The figure estimates the probability of capture at the first size extreme length 7.5 cm, and this value is less than the average converted length 5.0 cm.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Cumulative probability of D. savignyi. The predicted maximum length value and the 95% confidence interval are obtained from the intersection of the overall maximum length with the.

3.7. Fecundity

This is the first study so far on the estimation of fecundity of Diadema savignyi collected from the Northern (middle) Red Sea, Saudi Arabia. A total 60 females Diadema savignyi samples were used to estimate the absolute and the relative fecundity. The fecundity varied from 49,226 ova (total length 3.1 cm) to 466,133 ova (total length 6.8). The power relationship between absolute and relative to the total length and weight demonstrated that a positive and significant relationship at p < 0.05 (Fig. 10). As shown in Fig. 10, the relationship between the average absolute and relative fecundity and the total fish length could be described by the following power form:

Fabs=0.085877151L3.016R2=0.99
Frel=0.029092551L2.0004R2=0.98

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Relationship between the absulate fecundity (F) and total length (TL) also revealed linear regression model with a positive and significant relationship at p < 0.05.

Where, Fabs is the absolute fecundity, Frel, the relative fecundity and L is the total length in cm. The power relationships between Fabs–BW and Frel–BW can be expressed as:

line y and ×, z, respectively.

Fabs=0.067389133W1.8935R2=0.95
Frel=0.005862715W0.913R2=0.89

4. Discussion

The length-weight relationship has focused on the studies of population characteristics and fecundity of the Sea Urchin. The gonadal development, alteration, or metamorphosis, feeding rate, and maturity was documented through the FISAT (FAO-ICLARM Stock Assessment Tools) software (M Al-Beak, 2015). However, the Asymptotic length (L∞) is one of the key factors to identify the stock may shrink or grow for the long time in the ocean through the von Bertalanffy growth function (VBGF). The Asymptotic length (L∞) of D. savignyi has been found to be 7.35 cm along with the growth coefficient (K) value of 0.67 yr-1. Similarly, a study was revealed that in Southern Guimaras in Malaysia and found different values of L∞ = 11.30 and K = 1.30. from the species of T. gratilla (Regalado et al., 2011). It is interestingly important in the aspect of D. savignyi that first time observed stock assessment in the abhor island, Saudi Arabia.

Moreover, natural and fishing mortality indicated the present status of fish stock in the fisheries. In the studies, natural mortality (M) and fishing mortality (F) have been documented 2.02 yr−1 and 0.19/yr respectively from the D. savignyi. The natural mortality (M) and fishing mortality (F) were not found to be high in these fisheries my causes of lack of predatory and high organic matter (Boyd et al., 2020). Furthermore, the exploitation level (E) has found to be 0.10 which suggested that it is very low not responsible for the demolish fisheries.

In the absence of unexploited natural resources, it is often tedious to estimate natural mortality (M) empirically, therefore based on the knowledge of the life history characteristics of D. savignyi, a qualified guess of M was estimated (Romero-Gallardo et al., 2018). Even though, research suggests that once the juveniles of D. savignyi are beyond the parental care, natural mortality initially is relatively high. However, the resulted higher natural mortality than the fishing mortality showed a clear indication that the stock is under-fished, which means the lower the F value, the lower the exploitation rate. Moreover, yield is optimized when fishing mortality equals to natural mortality and exploitation rate at 0.5 is considered optimum level, and so when the exploitation rate is more than 0.5, the stock is said to be over-fished (Demirel, Zengin and Ulman, 2020).

The total instantaneous mortality, Z = 2.23 /yr. of D. savignyi in our study was more than the F value, which could be attributed to factors such as predations as some urchins have been observed attacking and preying on each other, disease, overpopulation of the stock and other exogenous factors that lead to death of urchins before attaining their expected lifespan (Estes et al., 2009). Sea urchins are most often killed by bad weather and heavy rainfall. However, mortality in urchins could be attributed to the fact that the juveniles are not targeted in the fishery or caught as bycatch since the larger the size of urchin caught, the larger the size of gonad and the price at market. It means there is a pragmatic approach to modeling age-specific mortality, which makes the mature urchins an explicit interest in the fishery (Steneck, 2013). In simple terms, M could be dichotomized into intrinsic and extrinsic effects in the fishery.

The reliability of M determined by M/K ratio is in the range of 1.22–2.50 for most fish species. However, the M/K ratio (2.02/0.67) of 3.01 obtained was within the above range, indicating that the natural mortality estimates were reliable for D. savignyi in the present study site. The ratio Z/K denotes predominance of growth on the mortality of the population if is < 1 and > 1 shows predominant of mortality on growth. Conversely, ratio Z/K = 1 means mortality is at a state of equilibrium on the population with the growth. The result (Z/K = 2.23/0.67 = 3.33) obtained from the present study showed that the mortality of D. savignyi was predominant on growth.

Again, from the probability curve of capture, the values estimated for the size at first capture was slightly less than the average converted length which showed that smaller size is also caught in the fishery. This also means that smaller sizes are not giving the opportunity to mature into full adult size before harvesting (Hunter, Speirs and Heath, 2015). Moreover, it could be attributed to small size net and illegal fishing gears used in the harvesting of the species. It is therefore recommended that large mesh sized nets of above 8.5 cm can be used for sustainability of the fishery.

The growth performance index (φ) obtained is the basis for comparison of growth indicators with the von assumption of Bertalanffy model. The index is the accurate and genuine procedure of computing the average growth parameters of a particular species (Okamoto et al., 2020). Henceforth, it should not differ significantly from compared values of different groups of data for the same kinds. However, the result obtained for φ (2.70) in D. savignyi seemed to be in the acceptable range. For the reason that a comparable study conducted by Shipp et al. (2015), who obtained the value of φ = 2.43. The classified growth performance index between the range of 2.65 to 3.32 is considered as a slow growth rate (Alaba OLOPADE, 2019). However, natality in population ecology is the scientific term for birth rate. Along with mortality rate, natality rate is used to calculate the dynamics of a population. They are the key factors in determining whether a population is increasing, decreasing or staying the same in size (Kindsvater et al., 2016). Natality is the greatest influence on a population's increase. The slow growth performance of T. gartilla obtained in the present study could be attributed to natality as it has a paramount influence to cause a population to increase or decrease. Therefore, natality in the study site should be discouraged.

Natality in population ecology is the scientific term for birth rate. Along with mortality rate, natality rate is used to calculate the dynamics of a population. They are the key factors in determining whether a population is increasing, decreasing or staying the same in size. Natality is the greatest influence on a population's increase.

In our study, the recruitment pattern of D. savignyi was found to be continuous throughout the year. The lowest and the highest percentage of recruitments were observed in May (1 %) and September (<19 %), respectively. Until now, there has been no published report on the recruitment of D. savignyi in Red in Saudi Arabia. However, the previous study of recruitment pattern of another species of T. gratilla in Southern Guimaras waters revealed that the recruitment occurred almost throughout the year with two peaks separated by four to five months (Seymour et al., 2013). The present study demonstrates that D. savignyi attained a maximum size of 7.5 cm within the 6.5 years of age. Previous study demonstrated that an individual with 6.5 to 7.5 cm on the other coast of Kenya can be 3 to 5 years old (Muthiga, 2003). The varry results comparisons can be said that lifespan and size is dependent on the location of the species natural harbitat and other factors. It indicated that D. savignyi has high growth coefficient in this area and it may for high organic matter due to the industrial area.

5. Conclusion

D. savignyi is a fast-growing species compare to the other Sea Urchin in the world. The population has documented less natural mortality and fishing mortality that wild stocks are still not minimal, and the stocks can be said 633 to be not exploited Therefore, it is to be threatened for the biodiversity such as algae and seagrass community on the coral reef. Furthermore, regular monitoring of stocks and analysis of capture data will allow for improve management of the fishery for better conservation of the resource as well as more profitable and sustainable fishing.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under Grant No D-987-130-1443. The authors, therefore, gratefully acknowledge DSR technical and financial support.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge with thanks to the Md. Afsar Sumon, and Asaad S. Lahmar for their scholastic suggestions and cooperation as well as thanks gratefully to DSR technical and financial support. D-987-130-1443.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Contributor Information

Mohammed Othman Aljahdali, Email: moaljahdali@kau.edu.sa.

Mohammad Habibur Rahman Molla, Email: mrahmanmolla@stu.kau.edu.sa.

References

  1. Alaba OLOPADE O., Eyina DIENYE H., Kweku Konney AMPONSAH S. A Preliminary Study of Growth Pattern, Condition Factor and Population Structure of Sicklefin Mullet, Liza falcipinnis (Valenciennes, 1836) in the New Calabar River, Nigeria. Turk. J. Sci. Technol. 2019;14(1):15–22. [Google Scholar]
  2. Atta C.J., Coker D.J., Sinclair-Taylor T.H., DiBattista J.D., Kattan A., Monroe A.A., Berumen M.L., Patterson H.M. Conspicuous and cryptic reef fishes from a unique and economically important region in the northern Red Sea. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0223365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyd C.E., D'Abramo L.R., Glencross B.D., Huyben D.C., Juarez L.M., Lockwood G.S., McNevin A.A., Tacon A.G.J., Teletchea F., Tomasso J.R., Tucker C.S., Valenti W.C. Achieving sustainable aquaculture: Historical and current perspectives and future needs and challenges. J. World Aquacult Soc. 2020;51(3):578–633. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cordeiro C.A.M.M., Harborne A.R., Ferreira C.E.L. The Biophysical Controls of Macroalgal Growth on Subtropical Reefs. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020;7:488. doi: 10.3389/FMARS.2020.00488/BIBTEX. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dautov S., Dautova T., Kashenko S. ‘Towards a scientific-based farming of sea urchins: First steps in the cultivation of Diadema setosum, Diadema savignyi and Mesocentrotus nudus’, APN. Science Bulletin. 2020;10(1) doi: 10.30852/SB.2020.1284. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Demirel N., Zengin M., Ulman A. First Large-Scale Eastern Mediterranean and Black Sea Stock Assessment Reveals a Dramatic Decline. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020;7:103. doi: 10.3389/FMARS.2020.00103/BIBTEX. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. DiBattista J.D., Howard Choat J., Gaither M.R., Hobbs J.-P., Lozano-Cortés D.F., Myers R.F., Paulay G., Rocha L.A., Toonen R.J., Westneat M.W., Berumen M.L. On the origin of endemic species in the Red Sea. J. Biogeogr. 2016;43(1):13–30. [Google Scholar]
  8. Elganainy A.A., Amin A.M. Age, growth, mortality rates and corresponding yield estimates of the snubnose emperor Lethrinus borbonicus from south Sinai coast, Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Aquat. Biol. & Fish. 2012;16(2):27–34. [Google Scholar]
  9. Estes J.A., Doak D.F., Springer A.M., Williams T.M. Causes and consequences of marine mammal population declines in southwest Alaska: a food-web perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2009;364(1524):1647–1658. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Farina S., et al. The challenge of managing the commercial harvesting of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus: Advanced approaches are required. PeerJ. 2020;8 doi: 10.7717/PEERJ.10093/SUPP-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fine M., Cinar M., Voolstra C.R., Safa A., Rinkevich B., Laffoley D., Hilmi N., Allemand D. Coral reefs of the Red Sea — Challenges and potential solutions. Regional Studies in Marine Science. 2019;25:100498. [Google Scholar]
  12. Grandcourt E.M., Abdessalaam T.Z.A., Francis F. Age, growth, mortality and reproduction of the blackspot snapper, Lutjanus fulviflamma (Forsskål, 1775), in the southern Arabian Gulf. Fish. Res. 2006;78(2–3):203–210. doi: 10.1016/J.FISHRES.2005.11.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guirguis A.N. ‘The Early Development of the Sea Urchin Diadema setosum (Leske, 1778) in the region of North Jeddah, Red Sea’. JKAU: Mar. Sci. 2010;21(2):3–14. doi: 10.4197/Mar. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hakim J., Schram J., Galloway A., Morrow C., Crowley M., Watts S., Bej A. ‘The Purple Sea Urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus Demonstrates a Compartmentalization of Gut Bacterial Microbiota, Predictive Functional Attributes, and Taxonomic Co-Occurrence. Microorganisms. 2019;7(2):35. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7020035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hunter A., Speirs D.C., Heath M.R. Fishery-induced changes to age and length dependent maturation schedules of three demersal fish species in the Firth of Clyde. Fish. Res. 2015;170:14–23. doi: 10.1016/J.FISHRES.2015.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kindsvater H.K., Mangel M., Reynolds J.D., Dulvy N.K. Ten principles from evolutionary ecology essential for effective marine conservation. Ecol. Evol. 2016;6(7):2125–2138. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Labbé-Bellas R., Cordeiro C.A.M.M., Floeter S.R., Segal B. Sea urchin abundance and habitat relationships in different Brazilian reef types. Regional Stud. Mar. Sci. 2016;8:33–40. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lassen, H. and Medley, P., n.d., ‘VIRTUAL POPULATION ANALYSIS-A PRACTICAL MANUAL FOR STOCK ASSESSMENT’.
  19. M Al-Beak A. Population Dynamic and Stock Assesment of White Seabream Diplodus sargus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Coast of North Siani. Fish. Aquac. J. 2015;06(04) doi: 10.4172/2150-3508.1000152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mos B., Byrne M., Dworjanyn S.A. Biogenic acidification reduces sea urchin gonad growth and increases susceptibility of aquaculture to ocean acidification. Mar. Environ. Res. 2016;113:39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Muthiga N.A. Coexistence and reproductive isolation of the sympatric echinoids Diadema savignyi Michelin and Diadema setosum (Leske) on Kenyan coral reefs. undefined. 2003;143(4):669–677. doi: 10.1007/S00227-003-1095-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Myhre S., Acevedo-Gutiérrez A. Recovery of sea urchin Diadema antillarum populations is correlated to increased coral and reduced macroalgal cover. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2007;329:205–210. doi: 10.3354/MEPS329205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. O’Loughlin, P.M., 1998. Distribution of DIADEMA SAVIGNYI and D. SETOSUM in the tropical Pacific, Echinoderms: San Francisco. Edited by R. Mooi and M.J. Telford. Balkema.
  24. Okamoto, D.K., Schroeter, S., Reed, D.C., 2020. ‘Effects of Ocean Climate on Spatiotemporal Variation in Sea Urchin Settlement and Recruitment’, bioRxiv, p. 387282. doi:10.1101/387282.
  25. Pauly, D., Soriano, M.L., 1986. ‘Some Practical Extensions to Beverton and Holt ’ s Relative Yield-Per-Recruit Model’, The First Asian Fisheries Forum. Asian Fisheries Society, (Jones 1957), pp. 491–495. Available at: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=PH8911123 (Accessed: 14 March 2021).
  26. Rahman M.A., Yusoff F.M., Arshad A., Shamsudin M.N., Amin S.M.N. Embryonic, larval, and early juvenile development of the tropical sea urchin, Salmacis sphaeroides (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) Sci. World J. 2012;2012:1–9. doi: 10.1100/2012/938482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rahman M.A., Md. Yusoff F., Arshad A., Amin S.M.N., Shamsudin M.N. Population characteristics and fecundity estimates of short-spined white sea urchin, Salmacis sphaeroides (Linnaeus, 1758) from the coastal waters of Johor, Malaysia. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2013;8(2):301–308. [Google Scholar]
  28. Regalado J., et al. Population Biology of Tripneustes gratilla (Linnaeus) (Echinodermata) in Seagrass Beds of Southern Guimaras, Philippines. Science Diliman. 2011;22(2) [Google Scholar]
  29. Romero-Gallardo S., et al. Natural mortality estimates throughout the life history of the sea cucumber Isostichopus Badionotus (Holothuroidea: Aspidochirotida) PeerJ. 2018;2018(7) doi: 10.7717/PEERJ.5235/SUPP-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sale P.F., Feary D.A., Burt J.A., Bauman A.G., Cavalcante G.H., Drouillard K.G., Kjerfve B., Marquis E., Trick C.G., Usseglio P., Van Lavieren H. The Growing Need for Sustainable Ecological Management of Marine Communities of the Persian Gulf. Ambio. 2011;40(1):4–17. doi: 10.1007/s13280-010-0092-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sangil C., Guzman H.M. Assessing the herbivore role of the sea-urchin Echinometra viridis: Keys to determine the structure of communities in disturbed coral reefs. Mar. Environ. Res. 2016;120:202–213. doi: 10.1016/J.MARENVRES.2016.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schneider A., Hommel G., Blettner M. Linear Regression Analysis: Part 14 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications. Deutsches Ärzteblatt Int. 2010;107(44):776. doi: 10.3238/ARZTEBL.2010.0776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Seymour S., Paul N.A., Dworjanyn S.A., de Nys R. Feeding preference and performance in the tropical sea urchin Tripneustes gratilla. Aquaculture. 2013;400-401:6–13. [Google Scholar]
  34. Siikavuopio S.I., Christiansen J.S., Sæther B.-S., Dale T. Seasonal variation in feed intake under constant temperature and natural photoperiod in the green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) Aquaculture. 2007;272(1-4):328–334. [Google Scholar]
  35. Solari P., et al. Chemosensitivity in the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) to Food-Related Compounds: An Innovative Behavioral Bioassay. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021;9:723. doi: 10.3389/FEVO.2021.749493/BIBTEX. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Spence M.A., Turtle A.J. Making the most of survey data: Incorporating age uncertainty when fitting growth parameters. Ecol. Evol. 2017;7(17):7058. doi: 10.1002/ECE3.3280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Steneck R.S. Sea urchins as drivers of shallow benthic marine community structure. Develop. Aquac. Fish. Sci. 2013;38:195–212. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-396491-5.00014-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zeina A., Darweesh K., Hellal A. Sea urchins (Echinoidea: Echinodermata) from Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea, Egypt. Int. J. Develop. 2016;5(1):129–147. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES