Table 2.
Black/AA compared to White |
Latinx compared to White |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. states | Rate ratio | 95% CI | No. states | Rate ratio | 95% CI | |
A. Random-effects models fit to state-specific log CFR ratios | ||||||
CTP | ||||||
Overall | 49 | 0.8 | (0.7, 0.9) | 23 | 0.4 | (0.3, 0.5) |
CDC | ||||||
Overall | 26 | 0.5 | (0.4, 0.6) | 14 | 0.2 | (0.2, 0.3) |
Age group | ||||||
18–49 | 2 (CA & NY) | 3.9 | (0.3, 44.5) | 3 (AZ, CA & NY) | 9.8 | (4.4, 21.9) |
50–64 | 12 | 2.1 | (1.2, 3.6) | 9 | 3.0 | (2.2, 3.9) |
65+ | 26 | 0.9 | (0.8, 1.1) | 13 | 0.9 | (0.8, 1.2) |
B. Mixed-effects Poisson regression model | ||||||
CDC | ||||||
Age group | ||||||
18–49 | 6.0 | (3.4, 10.8) | 4.1 | (1.9, 8.7) | ||
50–64 | 2.7 | (1.8, 4.1) | 2.4 | (1.5, 3.8) | ||
65+ | 1.0 | (0.8, 1.1) | 1.2 | (1.0, 1.4) |
Mixed effects model also adjusted for gender (estimated CFR ratio comparing women to men was 0.8 (95% CI [0.7, 0.8]) and chronological time (using a restricted cubic spline with 5 knots), and included random effects for state (estimated variance 0.31 (95% CI [0.19, 0.51]) and month within state (estimated variance 0.26 (95% CI [0.19, 0.37]).