Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 4;12:13372. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17342-5

Table 3.

Effects of different fertilizer treatments on chlorophyll contents of Pear-jujube.

Treatment Chl a (mg/dm2) Chl b (mg/dm2) TC (mg/dm2) Chl a/b
CK 6.08 ± 0.04 c 1.54 ± 0.06 c 7.62 ± 0.10 d 3.97 ± 0.13 a
CF 6.97 ± 0.09 b 2.10 ± 0.02 b 9.36 ± 0.34 c 3.61 ± 0.01 b
SC 7.76 ± 0.19 a 2.11 ± 0.15 b 9.66 ± 0.04 bc 3.60 ± 0.30 b
SM 8.38 ± 0.21 a 2.33 ± 0.01 ab 10.61 ± 0.34 ab 3.82 ± 0.05 a
BM 8.34 ± 0.61 a 2.55 ± 0.17 a 10.90 ± 0.78 a 3.27 ± 0.03 c

The data are the mean ± standard deviation of the parameters in this group. At different levels, each population mean follows a normal distribution with the same variance. The least significant difference (LSD) method was selected for analysis of variance in DPS software. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference between treatments (P < 0.05).

TC Total chlorophyll.