Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 22;13:946123. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.946123

Table 2.

The effects of each predicting variable on POR using AA model.

Variables Parameter estimation Standard error Wald χ2 p value
AMH [(3,~) vs [0,0.2]] –4.335 0.234 343.3393 <.0001
AMH [(2,3] vs [0,0.2]] –3.8031 0.252 227.7726 <.0001
AMH [(1.8,2] vs [0,0.2]] –3.2347 0.3292 96.5493 <.0001
AMH [(1.4,1.8] vs [0,0.2]] –2.883 0.245 138.4393 <.0001
AMH [(1.2,1.4] vs [0,0.2]] –2.3813 0.2546 87.4919 <.0001
AMH [(1.0,1.2] vs [0,0.2]] –2.2321 0.2458 82.4412 <.0001
AMH [(0.6,1.0] vs [0,0.2]] –1.6751 0.2147 60.8473 <.0001
AMH [(0.4,0.6] vs [0,0.2]] –0.8742 0.2357 13.7592 0.0002
AMH [(0.2,0.4] vs [0,0.2]] –0.5727 0.2406 5.6686 0.0173
Age [(42,~) vs [0,30]] 0.807 0.2305 12.2579 0.0005
Age [(39,42] vs [0,30]] 1.0434 0.1711 37.1979 <.0001
Age [(37,39] vs [0,30]] 0.5885 0.1794 10.7573 0.001
Age [(35,37] vs [0,30]] 0.4299 0.1705 6.3561 0.0117
Age [(30,35] vs [0,30]] 0.28 0.14 4.06 0.04