Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2020 Jun 11;142(25):10996–11005. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c02126

Table 1.

Optimization of Amination Conditionsa

graphic file with name nihms-1826487-t0006.jpg
Entry Catalyst Loading (mol%) Solvent Time Yield (%)d
1 10b C6D6 10 min > 99
2 5b C6D6 20 min > 99
3 2b C6D6 40 min 97
4 1b C6D6 90 min 96
5 0.1 C6D6 48 h 73
6 1b Hexanes 90 min 95
7 1b Et2O 90 min 96
8 1b (d8-)Toluenee 90 min 95
9 1b d8-THF 90 min 94
10 10 d6-DMSO N/Ac 0
11 10 d4-Methanol N/Ac 0
12 10 DCM N/A 0
a

Reaction were conducted on 0.2 mmol scale, see SI for details of the experiments.

b

Regeneration of 1 by 19F NMR spectroscopy.

c

Catalyst decomposition.

d

Yields were determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy using tetrakis(trimethylsilyl)silane as internal standard.

e

Both proteo- and deutero-toluene were tested as solvent, and no difference was observed.