Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 4;22:1486. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13883-6

Table 1.

Comparisons of sociodemographic factors and pretest outcome measures of the intervention and control groups

Total Intervention group
Social media
(n = 125)
Control group
Traditional strategies
(n = 117)
n (%) n (%) n (%) p valuea
Sociodemographic factors
 Educational levels
  Low: junior high school or under 56(23.43) 35(28.00) 21(18.42) 0.207
  Middle: senior high school 155(64.85) 77(61.60) 78(68.42)
  High: college or above 28(11.72) 13(10.40) 15(13.16)
 Marital status
  Unmarried 33(13.75) 13(10.48) 20(17.24) 0.270
  Married 192(80.00) 104(83.87) 88(75.97)
  Divorced 15(6.25) 7(5.65) 8(6.90)
 Metabolic syndrome
  Yes 90(44.55) 44(40.37) 46(49.46) 0.205
  No 112(55.45) 65(59.63) 47(50.54)
 BMI category
  Normal 38(18.54) 22(19.64) 16(17.20) 0.729
  Overweight 63(30.73) 36(32.14) 27(29.03)
  Obese 104(50.73) 54(48.21) 50(53.76)
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD p valueb
Age 47.6 ± 6.6 47.75 ± 5.41 47.37 ± 7.77 0.020*
BMI 27.3 ± 3.8 27.09 ± 3.96 27.5 ± 3.55 0.776
Outcome measures
 Self-perceived health status (range: 1–5) 2.44 ± 0.65 2.36 ± 0.65 2.53 ± 0.65 0.745
 Self-perceived susceptibility (range: 1–5) 2.91 ± 0.66 2.91 ± 0.64 2.92 ± 0.68 0.562
 Self-perceived severity (range: 1–5) 3.09 ± 0.76 3.10 ± 0.75 3.08 ± 0.77 0.889
 Perceived barriers (range: 1–4) 2.57 ± 0.36 2.56 ± 0.37 2.57 ± 0.34 0.663
 Cues to action (range: 1–4) 3.25 ± 0.57 3.27 ± 0.62 3.23 ± 0.51 0.294
 Self-efficacy (range: 1–4) 2.84 ± 0.66 2.90 ± 0.71 2.77 ± 0.58 0.177
 Healthy eating score (range: 0–1) 0.23 ± 0.19 0.22 ± 0.19 0.24 ± 0.18 0.073

a p value for the chi-square test

b p value for the t-test

BMI Body mass index

SD Standard deviation