Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 5;2022(8):CD010738. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010738.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Anonymous 1994 Not an RCT.
Anonymous 1997 Not an RCT.
Beldon 2009 Not an RCT.
Bolton 2008 Not an RCT.
Farina 1997 Hydrogel was not the only systematic difference between groups.
Flanagan 1995 Not an RCT.
Fonder 2008 Not an RCT.
Gibson 1995 Leg ulcers with mixed aetiology presenting < 75% of venous leg ulcer in each group of the study.
Hampton 2004 Not an RCT.
Hofman 2006 Not an RCT.
Hutchinson 1997 Not a treatment of interest.
JNMA 2007 Not an RCT.
Jull 2013 Not an RCT.
Karlsmark 2002 Not a treatment of interest.
Kerstein 2001 Not an RCT.
Kikta 1988 Hydrogel dressing was not the only systematic difference across treatment groups.
Lafferty 2011 Not an RCT.
Larsen 1997 Not a treatment of interest.
Lawall 2012 Not an RCT.
Milne 2014 Not an RCT.
Perez 2000 Not a treatment of interest.
Pirie 2009 Not an RCT.
Robinson 1988 Not a treatment of interest.
Robinson 1996 No separate report of data for participants with venous leg ulcers.
Sironi 2003 Hydrogel dressing was not the only systematic difference across treatment groups.
Timmons 2008 Not an RCT.
Werner‐Schlenzka 1994 Not a treatment of interest.
Young 2005 Not an RCT.

RCT: randomised controlled trial.